Oh come on, don't hold back, tell us what you really think LOL
I was under the impression that ATN was a Russian abreviation for "garbage"
The only 1 I have had any experience with was so fuzzy to look through I figured is was fur lined inside the tube.
Save your $$ and when you can but a real scope, good optics are never a mistake.
How about the 10x65 Z-Shape scopes? They run about $800-900. They look interesting. Has anyone had any experience with them? Is it another option from a Mark 4? If you haven't used one please don't flame it. I would like an honest opinion from an owner of one or at least a user.
I would not use anything that sais ATN on it. But by all means buy it and let us know what you think.. The only one I bought a long time ago was complete junk. I didnt even have the heart to give it away. It was not the model that you are showing in your link. But I would find it hard to believe that it is any better at all than the crap I had.
I remember examining the ATN scopes at the 2006 Shot Show. They were bloody awful! I felt sorry for the poor kid manning the booth...he looked sorta nervous, like he knew he was hawking junk.
I have seen ATN scopes up close calling them junk is a disservice to junk every where. There are a lot decent value priced scopes out there, make sure you look through them before you plunk down your hard earned money.