W-W introduced new 6.5 Staball powder

When I looked at the load info for the
22-250 with 55 grain bullets the velocity they are quoting is very impressive. They state 3887 fps, wow!
 
I saw a ran a ladder on a Facebook group, it was in a 25 creedmoor, he had slightly higher FPS than H4350 before pressure, It's supposed to be a comparable powder in that burn rate. I bet RL16 still makes more fps.
 
6 CM, 24" 1:8", 105gr bullet, 43.7gr Staball 3156fps.
In my 6 CM, 24" 1:7.5" , 105 Hyb, 43.0 H4350 gets me 3101, and 44.0 H4350 gets me 3200. Pretty comparable. I don't see 30-200fps faster with that data.
 
6 CM, 24" 1:8", 105gr bullet, 43.7gr Staball 3156fps.
In my 6 CM, 24" 1:7.5" , 105 Hyb, 43.0 H4350 gets me 3101, and 44.0 H4350 gets me 3200. Pretty comparable. I don't see 30-200fps faster with that data.
Thanks for posting up your load of H4350. However, that's not really apples to apples. Your load is over the recommended charge and your comparing to one that at a lower comparable charge. If you can go over recommended in your rifle the new powder would likely be a bit faster.

This is the Hogdon data for the 6mm Creedmoor and 105. Not the Berger and not that rifle but should be somewhat combarable. Those H4350 loads would track pretty consistent to this data.
Studio_20191103_081744.png
 
Thanks for posting up your load of H4350. However, that's not really apples to apples. Your load is over the recommended charge and your comparing to one that at a lower comparable charge. If you can go over recommended in your rifle the new powder would likely be a bit faster.

This is the Hogdon data for the 6mm Creedmoor and 105. Not the Berger and not that rifle but should be somewhat combarable. Those H4350 loads would track pretty consistent to this data.
View attachment 156263

I think you're comparing tested loads to a loading table in a manual. This guy's rifle might also digest a heavier load of the new powder, just like it does the H-4350 load. Maybe it would be faster than 4350; maybe it wouldn't. Need to try it to find out.
 
I think you're comparing tested loads to a loading table in a manual. This guy's rifle might also digest a heavier load of the new powder, just like it does the H-4350 load. Maybe it would be faster than 4350; maybe it wouldn't. Need to try it to find out.
Hence the not apples to apples reference. If lancetkenyonʻs rifle will take a charge of H4350 that is 1.6gr over published data safely it likely would take a similarly larger charge of Staball. Not a Fair comparison to judge from.
 
It seems there are mixed results as far as temp stability goes. That said, I never has super stability with H4350 like some folks do. Maybe it's barrel or some other type variable that can throw it out of its element?
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top