Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Muzzleloader Hunting
Volume vs Weight measuring question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SidecarFlip" data-source="post: 852209" data-attributes="member: 39764"><p>You didn't say what propellant you are using but I load 209 and a TMZ and leave it in there for an extended time.</p><p> </p><p>Yesterday I ran out of 209 (loaded 8 tubes) and used them all and switched to Go-Ex that a buddy had. Go-Ex (think thats it) is appreciably dirtier than 209 both in barrel fouling and difficulty of removal/cleaning.</p><p> </p><p>Never considered and bipod for an ML. They are already front heavy and the BPod makes that more so.</p><p> </p><p>I think (IMO) that a more powerful (magnification wise) scope would be better. I run a Nikon 3-9 in Realtree on mine which is actually out of character for me but Vortex don't offer a camo scope.....</p><p> </p><p>Nice groups (at 200 btw). Groups don't count however because you only get one shot......lol</p><p> </p><p>One thing to keep in mind is that at 200, a deer will get the jump on you so your shot placement changes (sometimes for the worse), one reason I never go much past 125 yards with a whitetail. besides, as the velocity degrades, the pill drops like a rock......</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SidecarFlip, post: 852209, member: 39764"] You didn't say what propellant you are using but I load 209 and a TMZ and leave it in there for an extended time. Yesterday I ran out of 209 (loaded 8 tubes) and used them all and switched to Go-Ex that a buddy had. Go-Ex (think thats it) is appreciably dirtier than 209 both in barrel fouling and difficulty of removal/cleaning. Never considered and bipod for an ML. They are already front heavy and the BPod makes that more so. I think (IMO) that a more powerful (magnification wise) scope would be better. I run a Nikon 3-9 in Realtree on mine which is actually out of character for me but Vortex don't offer a camo scope..... Nice groups (at 200 btw). Groups don't count however because you only get one shot......lol One thing to keep in mind is that at 200, a deer will get the jump on you so your shot placement changes (sometimes for the worse), one reason I never go much past 125 yards with a whitetail. besides, as the velocity degrades, the pill drops like a rock...... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Muzzleloader Hunting
Volume vs Weight measuring question
Top