Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
US Supreme Court
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dbhostler" data-source="post: 197688" data-attributes="member: 799"><p>Thanks for the info. Not being a lawyer it would seem to me that the court in the past has a very narrow interpretation of the law and how it applies to just the case set before them. I would wish they would rule that all laws banning the keeping and bearing, weather state, county or local would be found unconstitutional. But I guess that will never happen. The Feds seem to give the ok, to violate the ammendments, to the states as they will. But I thought the constitution was over and above any and all states. Isn't that what the civil war was all about?</p><p>db</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dbhostler, post: 197688, member: 799"] Thanks for the info. Not being a lawyer it would seem to me that the court in the past has a very narrow interpretation of the law and how it applies to just the case set before them. I would wish they would rule that all laws banning the keeping and bearing, weather state, county or local would be found unconstitutional. But I guess that will never happen. The Feds seem to give the ok, to violate the ammendments, to the states as they will. But I thought the constitution was over and above any and all states. Isn't that what the civil war was all about? db [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
US Supreme Court
Top