Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
This may have been answerd but i need more Info
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Warren Jensen" data-source="post: 326" data-attributes="member: 21"><p>Darryl,</p><p></p><p>You are right. The math doesn't work. </p><p></p><p>Coyote Slayer,</p><p></p><p>We are not questioning you veracity, just your math. Please check your numbers and get back to us. I also have a .224/284 and am real familiar with it's capabilities. Tell us more about the 224 Clarke, like it's powder capacity, chronographed velocities, etc.</p><p></p><p>A 6.5/284 would be a better choice, because of a better selection of higher BC bullets.</p><p></p><p>Again, no offense intended, but on this board we tend to deal in the details.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Warren Jensen, post: 326, member: 21"] Darryl, You are right. The math doesn't work. Coyote Slayer, We are not questioning you veracity, just your math. Please check your numbers and get back to us. I also have a .224/284 and am real familiar with it's capabilities. Tell us more about the 224 Clarke, like it's powder capacity, chronographed velocities, etc. A 6.5/284 would be a better choice, because of a better selection of higher BC bullets. Again, no offense intended, but on this board we tend to deal in the details. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
This may have been answerd but i need more Info
Top