Bigfishonafly
Active Member
Sig better get that in writing. A direct reading of the rules is different than one cops interpretation of that rule. Sig advertises they are oregon legal. The rule says any "scope that receives information from . . . Any electronic device" is prohibited. A direct reading says this scope is not legal. If I was cited or arrested for using one of these scopes when sig advertises they are legal at the best I would be ****ed off. At the worst sig would be responding to a law suit. Don't take this wrong. I like your technology. I have a whiskey 5 and for the money it's a great scope. I was looking at the BDX for my 15 yr old son. But I think they are not legal in oregon.
Look at how BTF went from saying bump stocks are legal to nope now it's a felony. I don't need to drop several hundred dollars on a scope that by a strict reading is not legal. I deal with cops on a daily basis. I know they interpret the laws differently. For that matter so do judges. Sig is taking a big chance with someone else's life with their advertising these are Oregon legal.
Look at how BTF went from saying bump stocks are legal to nope now it's a felony. I don't need to drop several hundred dollars on a scope that by a strict reading is not legal. I deal with cops on a daily basis. I know they interpret the laws differently. For that matter so do judges. Sig is taking a big chance with someone else's life with their advertising these are Oregon legal.