Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Savage 116 vs Remington 700
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Barrelnut" data-source="post: 1175587" data-attributes="member: 74902"><p>The Savage 116 is nice. But if stainless is what you are looking for in a 300 win mag, I would get the Savage 116 Bear Hunter. Come with a nice stock, flutes barrel AND brake. </p><p>The brake will really bring the recoil down when shooting the 300 win at long distances from prone position. Also the brake helps you spot your shot at long distance.</p><p>You wouldn't have to do anything to a rifle like this for a long time and might be a better deal than trying to upgrade it in the future.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Barrelnut, post: 1175587, member: 74902"] The Savage 116 is nice. But if stainless is what you are looking for in a 300 win mag, I would get the Savage 116 Bear Hunter. Come with a nice stock, flutes barrel AND brake. The brake will really bring the recoil down when shooting the 300 win at long distances from prone position. Also the brake helps you spot your shot at long distance. You wouldn't have to do anything to a rifle like this for a long time and might be a better deal than trying to upgrade it in the future. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Savage 116 vs Remington 700
Top