Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
SARAH PALIN - My kind of gal!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roll-Yur-Own" data-source="post: 230324" data-attributes="member: 6140"><p>Thanks for answering. The world would be a better place without a lot of dictators but we don't attack them. Another fact is that taking out a dictator like Sadam can open the door for far worse leaders.</p><p></p><p>Ok, even though most people in Washington admit that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, let say you are right. At least you do say "indirectly". Well then that would put a lot of others in that boat like Iran, Syria, Palestinians, etc. Should we invade all those countries? Fact is that Iran supported Bin Laden way more than Iraq.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure EVERYBODY agrees that Bin Laden is the #1 guy responsible for 9/11. So, why did bush send 10 times the number of troops into Iraq than Afghanastan?</p><p></p><p>So, for my next question....</p><p></p><p>Why did we go after Sadam instead of Bin Laden?</p><p></p><p>Please answer.</p><p></p><p>Slymule, would you like to answer any of the questions?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roll-Yur-Own, post: 230324, member: 6140"] Thanks for answering. The world would be a better place without a lot of dictators but we don't attack them. Another fact is that taking out a dictator like Sadam can open the door for far worse leaders. Ok, even though most people in Washington admit that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, let say you are right. At least you do say "indirectly". Well then that would put a lot of others in that boat like Iran, Syria, Palestinians, etc. Should we invade all those countries? Fact is that Iran supported Bin Laden way more than Iraq. I'm sure EVERYBODY agrees that Bin Laden is the #1 guy responsible for 9/11. So, why did bush send 10 times the number of troops into Iraq than Afghanastan? So, for my next question.... Why did we go after Sadam instead of Bin Laden? Please answer. Slymule, would you like to answer any of the questions? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
SARAH PALIN - My kind of gal!
Top