Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Rianov SOLO vs. Kestrel AB vs. G7 BR2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrankPetersenDK" data-source="post: 859044" data-attributes="member: 45071"><p>Let me be more specific then, as to which variables that must be entered into the specific device in order to obtain a valid ballistic solution.</p><p> </p><p>Rianov: High valid range info must be obtained by a rangefinder, as I assume the rangefinder will be more accurate than the built in ranging function. Wind data - velocity and direction - must also be entered. </p><p> </p><p>Kestrel AB: High valid range info must be obtained from a rangefinder. In addition, the slope angle must be entered into the device for a valid ballistic solution.</p><p> </p><p>G7 BR2: Wind data must be entered in order to obtain valid ballistic solution.</p><p> </p><p>The Rianov and Kestrel units are "generic" as they provide bullet path output which is executiable by any scope.</p><p> </p><p>The G7 BR2 output is "ballistic range equivalent", which is best executed with a scope that has a custom turret for the ammo used.</p><p> </p><p>I hope this clears up any confusion.</p><p> </p><p>Frank</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrankPetersenDK, post: 859044, member: 45071"] Let me be more specific then, as to which variables that must be entered into the specific device in order to obtain a valid ballistic solution. Rianov: High valid range info must be obtained by a rangefinder, as I assume the rangefinder will be more accurate than the built in ranging function. Wind data - velocity and direction - must also be entered. Kestrel AB: High valid range info must be obtained from a rangefinder. In addition, the slope angle must be entered into the device for a valid ballistic solution. G7 BR2: Wind data must be entered in order to obtain valid ballistic solution. The Rianov and Kestrel units are "generic" as they provide bullet path output which is executiable by any scope. The G7 BR2 output is "ballistic range equivalent", which is best executed with a scope that has a custom turret for the ammo used. I hope this clears up any confusion. Frank [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Rianov SOLO vs. Kestrel AB vs. G7 BR2
Top