Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Replacing Leupold with Leica
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iiiNelson" data-source="post: 2768883" data-attributes="member: 113766"><p>For me it was about the whole package. I have some Swaro and Leica glass. For my eyes the NL pure was a noticeably better than the Leica in a pure binocular. The EL was more or less about the same but there were subjective differences that could make one choose one or another. The Zeiss is up there too. </p><p></p><p>For me the biggest reason that many choose Swaro over other is the FOV. This isn't insignificant but it's also isn't everything. One of the largest reasons people choose Leica over others is greater subject isolation. For a small percentage of people the field flattening effect in Swaro is disorienting if/when you pan and focus on the edges… it's not a issue of mine and the reason I still consider picking up a set of NL Pure's for just observing wildlife. </p><p></p><p>Like I said above my Geovid Pro 32's were a practical choice in something that I could use for archery, rifle, and birding/photography with or without the rangefinders on. The lenses are a noticeable step up in quality from the older ones IMO for me. I was concerned about them being 32's at first so I got them in 8x power to maximize light gathering. My buddy got a set in 10x and he's happy with them as well. I lean towards getting a 10x in the 42's at some point but it's lower priority for me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iiiNelson, post: 2768883, member: 113766"] For me it was about the whole package. I have some Swaro and Leica glass. For my eyes the NL pure was a noticeably better than the Leica in a pure binocular. The EL was more or less about the same but there were subjective differences that could make one choose one or another. The Zeiss is up there too. For me the biggest reason that many choose Swaro over other is the FOV. This isn’t insignificant but it’s also isn’t everything. One of the largest reasons people choose Leica over others is greater subject isolation. For a small percentage of people the field flattening effect in Swaro is disorienting if/when you pan and focus on the edges… it’s not a issue of mine and the reason I still consider picking up a set of NL Pure’s for just observing wildlife. Like I said above my Geovid Pro 32’s were a practical choice in something that I could use for archery, rifle, and birding/photography with or without the rangefinders on. The lenses are a noticeable step up in quality from the older ones IMO for me. I was concerned about them being 32’s at first so I got them in 8x power to maximize light gathering. My buddy got a set in 10x and he’s happy with them as well. I lean towards getting a 10x in the 42’s at some point but it’s lower priority for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Replacing Leupold with Leica
Top