Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Nosler long range accubond 30 cal 190 gr - results?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Don Titus" data-source="post: 974531" data-attributes="member: 61851"><p>I tried both H1000 and RL 22 a while ago and got reasonably good results with 180's and 200's but I dropped the idea of using 22 because of its temperature sensitivity ...that said I think I will try H1000 again, this time with the 190 ABLR's and see how they stack up against H4831SC. </p><p></p><p>As to "heavy" versus "light" light bullets, the ballistic data is incontrovertible to a point.. Using the same but heavier bullets wins put almost every time for long range energy retention...one exception being when comparing regular Accubonds versus ABLR's.</p><p></p><p>The following data was obtained using Nikon's "Spot On" ballistic software (free on their website) using close to max loads of H4831SC:</p><p></p><p>At 200yds. 180 AB - 2900; 190ABLR - 3136; 200 AB - 3138</p><p>300yds. 180 - 2750; 190 - 2942; 200 - 2910</p><p>400yds. 180 - 2510; 190 - 2758; 200 - 2710</p><p>500yds. 180 - 2310; 190 - 2583; 200 - 2565</p><p></p><p>I don't have info beyond 500yds. For the 180/200 but the 190ABLR still produces over 2000 ft-lbs out to 850 (900/1965;950/1897;1000/1830.</p><p></p><p>I hope this helps.</p><p></p><p>Don</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Don Titus, post: 974531, member: 61851"] I tried both H1000 and RL 22 a while ago and got reasonably good results with 180's and 200's but I dropped the idea of using 22 because of its temperature sensitivity ...that said I think I will try H1000 again, this time with the 190 ABLR's and see how they stack up against H4831SC. As to "heavy" versus "light" light bullets, the ballistic data is incontrovertible to a point.. Using the same but heavier bullets wins put almost every time for long range energy retention...one exception being when comparing regular Accubonds versus ABLR's. The following data was obtained using Nikon's "Spot On" ballistic software (free on their website) using close to max loads of H4831SC: At 200yds. 180 AB - 2900; 190ABLR - 3136; 200 AB - 3138 300yds. 180 - 2750; 190 - 2942; 200 - 2910 400yds. 180 - 2510; 190 - 2758; 200 - 2710 500yds. 180 - 2310; 190 - 2583; 200 - 2565 I don't have info beyond 500yds. For the 180/200 but the 190ABLR still produces over 2000 ft-lbs out to 850 (900/1965;950/1897;1000/1830. I hope this helps. Don [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Nosler long range accubond 30 cal 190 gr - results?
Top