Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March 2.5-25x52 vs….
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shooters" data-source="post: 2385134" data-attributes="member: 7769"><p>My favorite scope optically is my Kahles 318i (just got 2 weeks ago) or my well used Kahles 525i. I feel it has the best resolution and light gathering out of it the ATACR, Mark5HD, Swaros, NX8 and Zeiss's. And it's SMALL! And actually, over all I'd pick the 318i for shooting steel and hunting. The only draw backs for me on the Kahles are the smaller reticle on low power (FFP) and the "ring" inside the scope that stops any CA from what I understand. It's about near perfect. Just wish it wasn't 32oz. That's why the March is on my list. BUT, I guess I'm weird. I'd take 4-6oz more on an optic if it meant a visible difference optically. That's what has me slightly worried about the March. But with the demo to try, that might change things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shooters, post: 2385134, member: 7769"] My favorite scope optically is my Kahles 318i (just got 2 weeks ago) or my well used Kahles 525i. I feel it has the best resolution and light gathering out of it the ATACR, Mark5HD, Swaros, NX8 and Zeiss’s. And it’s SMALL! And actually, over all I’d pick the 318i for shooting steel and hunting. The only draw backs for me on the Kahles are the smaller reticle on low power (FFP) and the “ring” inside the scope that stops any CA from what I understand. It’s about near perfect. Just wish it wasn’t 32oz. That’s why the March is on my list. BUT, I guess I’m weird. I’d take 4-6oz more on an optic if it meant a visible difference optically. That’s what has me slightly worried about the March. But with the demo to try, that might change things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March 2.5-25x52 vs….
Top