Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Kirby Allen’s “no load development” load development method.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fiftydriver" data-source="post: 697896" data-attributes="member: 10"><p>If you have every witnessed the quality of the machining in a factory receiver in the areas of bolt squareness, receiver squareness, receiver thread alignment, barrel thread alignment, barrel thread fit to receiver thread and barrel shoulder squareness you would already know what I am referring to.</p><p> </p><p>If everything is perfectly square and true in axial alignment, vibration patterns will be extremely consistant from shot to shot, load to load. When the machining is poor, vibration patterns become erratic from load to load and even shot to shot. </p><p> </p><p>I am not saying the vibration patterns are not there in a custom rifle, just saying they are much more consistant from load to load which is one of the reasons a full custom, top quality rifle is much easier to get to shoot very well and also why they generally shoot most loads very well.</p><p> </p><p>This is also why most factory rifles have a particular preference for a certain bullet or velocity range.</p><p> </p><p>It seems your trying very hard to hold something back, if you have something to say please be direct and let us all know what your thinking. Seems all you do is question my comments and make me explain them which I have no problem doing for others that want to hear of my experience but in your case I suspect that is not the reason for your questioning!!!<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fiftydriver, post: 697896, member: 10"] If you have every witnessed the quality of the machining in a factory receiver in the areas of bolt squareness, receiver squareness, receiver thread alignment, barrel thread alignment, barrel thread fit to receiver thread and barrel shoulder squareness you would already know what I am referring to. If everything is perfectly square and true in axial alignment, vibration patterns will be extremely consistant from shot to shot, load to load. When the machining is poor, vibration patterns become erratic from load to load and even shot to shot. I am not saying the vibration patterns are not there in a custom rifle, just saying they are much more consistant from load to load which is one of the reasons a full custom, top quality rifle is much easier to get to shoot very well and also why they generally shoot most loads very well. This is also why most factory rifles have a particular preference for a certain bullet or velocity range. It seems your trying very hard to hold something back, if you have something to say please be direct and let us all know what your thinking. Seems all you do is question my comments and make me explain them which I have no problem doing for others that want to hear of my experience but in your case I suspect that is not the reason for your questioning!!!:rolleyes: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Kirby Allen’s “no load development” load development method.
Top