Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
"Inherently more accurate"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Barrelnut" data-source="post: 1785654" data-attributes="member: 74902"><p>^^^ This^^^</p><p>CM is not more inherently accurate than a 260 or 243 something. Shorter powder columns though do seem to be more inherently accurate than long cartridges like a 300 Win mag or similar . This is mostly due to the short powder column which tends to get a more uniform burn of the powder. Also the powders used in short cartridges are faster burning powders which tend to enhance accuracy as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Barrelnut, post: 1785654, member: 74902"] ^^^ This^^^ CM is not more inherently accurate than a 260 or 243 something. Shorter powder columns though do seem to be more inherently accurate than long cartridges like a 300 Win mag or similar . This is mostly due to the short powder column which tends to get a more uniform burn of the powder. Also the powders used in short cartridges are faster burning powders which tend to enhance accuracy as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
"Inherently more accurate"
Top