Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Extreme Long Range Hunting & Shooting (ELR)
How i Test Ballistic Coefficients-Matrix 175gr
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MuleHunter" data-source="post: 675609" data-attributes="member: 14190"><p>I have not done the extensive testing with the 165's, however a reliable source that uses similar BC testing told me he is using .638 for the 165's. That sounds right to me given the fact that they both have the same Ogive and boat tail design. The 175 has a longer bearing surface and higher sectional density and I believe that is why its BC is only marginally higher. The 175 does shoot incredibly out of a 9 twist 5R Benchmark though and I have severe doubts that I could get another bullet to preform that accurately.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MuleHunter, post: 675609, member: 14190"] I have not done the extensive testing with the 165's, however a reliable source that uses similar BC testing told me he is using .638 for the 165's. That sounds right to me given the fact that they both have the same Ogive and boat tail design. The 175 has a longer bearing surface and higher sectional density and I believe that is why its BC is only marginally higher. The 175 does shoot incredibly out of a 9 twist 5R Benchmark though and I have severe doubts that I could get another bullet to preform that accurately. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Extreme Long Range Hunting & Shooting (ELR)
How i Test Ballistic Coefficients-Matrix 175gr
Top