Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Hornady Podcast
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nksmfamjp" data-source="post: 2690504" data-attributes="member: 1951"><p>Well, I think it told us a couple of things. Hornady makes some of the best factory ammo IMO. Did they really just find statistics, or was this just a deeper dive?</p><p></p><p>Also, their histogram does not follow the normal distribution as well as 200 shots should. I figure they have a couple of variables in that data which is impacting the distribution….probably needs more work on consistency of methods. ….or is that barrel wear? Not sure. It just wasn't Gaussian enough for me. I would have liked to see velocity vs number of shots too and accuracy vs number of shots.</p><p></p><p>Last, I think their conclusions are interesting. Does accuracy really come down to component selection, and charge weight/seating depth matter less? Seems like that really is not understood well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nksmfamjp, post: 2690504, member: 1951"] Well, I think it told us a couple of things. Hornady makes some of the best factory ammo IMO. Did they really just find statistics, or was this just a deeper dive? Also, their histogram does not follow the normal distribution as well as 200 shots should. I figure they have a couple of variables in that data which is impacting the distribution….probably needs more work on consistency of methods. ….or is that barrel wear? Not sure. It just wasn’t Gaussian enough for me. I would have liked to see velocity vs number of shots too and accuracy vs number of shots. Last, I think their conclusions are interesting. Does accuracy really come down to component selection, and charge weight/seating depth matter less? Seems like that really is not understood well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Hornady Podcast
Top