Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4831 vs h4831SC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="benchracer" data-source="post: 970416" data-attributes="member: 22069"><p>The SC or SSC designated powders normally allow for higher load density, so you can typically get a bit more powder in a given case when using compressed loads. Use of a drop tube can further increase this advantage.</p><p> </p><p>Yes, you can use the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, but the SC version may allow you to get a bit more in situations where you are maxing out case volume with the standard powder before reaching pressure limits.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="benchracer, post: 970416, member: 22069"] The SC or SSC designated powders normally allow for higher load density, so you can typically get a bit more powder in a given case when using compressed loads. Use of a drop tube can further increase this advantage. Yes, you can use the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, but the SC version may allow you to get a bit more in situations where you are maxing out case volume with the standard powder before reaching pressure limits. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4831 vs h4831SC
Top