Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
GS Custom bullets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="edge" data-source="post: 150929" data-attributes="member: 5030"><p>IMO, that link is great, it helps that I agree with about 90% of his views /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif</p><p></p><p>The links from there are useful and make for some good reading too. </p><p>The SC study was interesting even though I don't really agree with the results. It is interesting to see any large group of data that involves a lot of animals shot. IMO, I think that it puts into perspective how many shots on game it may take to get useful results regarding a particular type of bullet. </p><p></p><p>edge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="edge, post: 150929, member: 5030"] IMO, that link is great, it helps that I agree with about 90% of his views [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] The links from there are useful and make for some good reading too. The SC study was interesting even though I don't really agree with the results. It is interesting to see any large group of data that involves a lot of animals shot. IMO, I think that it puts into perspective how many shots on game it may take to get useful results regarding a particular type of bullet. edge. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
GS Custom bullets
Top