Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
G1–G7: Nearly had a heart attack!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WiscGunner" data-source="post: 1650778" data-attributes="member: 97288"><p>Errors are measurable.</p><p></p><p>It is impossible for a single component manufacture to account for the infinite variable from available parts. The inherent "error" in the design of a system that uses multiple interfaces will be there 100% of the time. Custom fitting IS required to remove this stacked tolerance, wether done by the consumer, the builder or the manufacture. </p><p></p><p>Burris rings allow this custom fitting without material removal.</p><p></p><p>Lapping rings accounts for the stacking tolerances by addressing it at the end point.</p><p></p><p>Truing receivers, bedding bases and reducing interfaces limited the amount of correction needed at the endpoint.</p><p></p><p>ANYONE who says custom fitting isn't required simple has a less refined view of precision. The ONLY way to not need to custom fit your setup is if the manufacture makes a custom setup for you. There is no avoiding it, just deciding how much much quality you are willing to sacrifice.</p><p></p><p>As you as simply speculating, it is very easy to measure the error in your setup as it WILL be there. Once you have the facts (how much your stacked tolerances add up too) you can decide if that needs to be corrected. </p><p></p><p>Highest level components are still susceptible to stacking tolerances. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]137345[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]137346[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WiscGunner, post: 1650778, member: 97288"] Errors are measurable. It is impossible for a single component manufacture to account for the infinite variable from available parts. The inherent “error” in the design of a system that uses multiple interfaces will be there 100% of the time. Custom fitting IS required to remove this stacked tolerance, wether done by the consumer, the builder or the manufacture. Burris rings allow this custom fitting without material removal. Lapping rings accounts for the stacking tolerances by addressing it at the end point. Truing receivers, bedding bases and reducing interfaces limited the amount of correction needed at the endpoint. ANYONE who says custom fitting isn’t required simple has a less refined view of precision. The ONLY way to not need to custom fit your setup is if the manufacture makes a custom setup for you. There is no avoiding it, just deciding how much much quality you are willing to sacrifice. As you as simply speculating, it is very easy to measure the error in your setup as it WILL be there. Once you have the facts (how much your stacked tolerances add up too) you can decide if that needs to be corrected. Highest level components are still susceptible to stacking tolerances. [ATTACH=full]137345[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]137346[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
G1–G7: Nearly had a heart attack!
Top