Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Energy or bullet diameter most important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RockyMtnMT" data-source="post: 1235196" data-attributes="member: 7999"><p>There is no need to get chippy. </p><p></p><p>As the frangible bullet comes undone the wound channel it large in dia and it slows down rapidly. The slower it goes the smaller the wound channel becomes. It leaves potential for the wound not to reach both lungs or the far side with a good wound all the way.</p><p></p><p>If you really want to know the answers based in actual science then you will read the link that I provided. It takes every scenario and tests it scientifically to see if it has merit or not. The goal for all of us is to stack the odds in our favor in order to lessen the potential for a failure or a poor outcome. </p><p></p><p>I gave the link to the scientific data that backs up my position. It is quite long and thorough, and I can not recite it in it's entirety. If you really have a passion to know you will not be disappointed in reading it.</p><p></p><p>Steve</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RockyMtnMT, post: 1235196, member: 7999"] There is no need to get chippy. As the frangible bullet comes undone the wound channel it large in dia and it slows down rapidly. The slower it goes the smaller the wound channel becomes. It leaves potential for the wound not to reach both lungs or the far side with a good wound all the way. If you really want to know the answers based in actual science then you will read the link that I provided. It takes every scenario and tests it scientifically to see if it has merit or not. The goal for all of us is to stack the odds in our favor in order to lessen the potential for a failure or a poor outcome. I gave the link to the scientific data that backs up my position. It is quite long and thorough, and I can not recite it in it's entirety. If you really have a passion to know you will not be disappointed in reading it. Steve [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Energy or bullet diameter most important?
Top