Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Do You Have a Responsibility To Fight?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tinman13kup" data-source="post: 774901" data-attributes="member: 36220"><p>It sounds good in theory, but I think you would find too many would not act. People who would join in have their own thresholds as to when action should be taken. You have the "people didn't need those anyhow" crowd, the "it's not MY gun" crowd, the "it's not my house" group, and the "I'll wait and see if others deal with it first" crowd. </p><p></p><p> Between those groups and those who WOULD take the initial stand, it would result in isolated incidents and be overwhelmed fairly quick. It might serve as a primer for a more united stand, but communications and organization would be lacking. </p><p></p><p> I think the government knows this, and understands if they take small incremental steps with "alternatives" (in their opinion), they can avoid any type of organized standing other than protests. They will always say "you don't need this, but you can use that", which avoids backing gunowners into the proverbial corner.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tinman13kup, post: 774901, member: 36220"] It sounds good in theory, but I think you would find too many would not act. People who would join in have their own thresholds as to when action should be taken. You have the "people didn't need those anyhow" crowd, the "it's not MY gun" crowd, the "it's not my house" group, and the "I'll wait and see if others deal with it first" crowd. Between those groups and those who WOULD take the initial stand, it would result in isolated incidents and be overwhelmed fairly quick. It might serve as a primer for a more united stand, but communications and organization would be lacking. I think the government knows this, and understands if they take small incremental steps with "alternatives" (in their opinion), they can avoid any type of organized standing other than protests. They will always say "you don't need this, but you can use that", which avoids backing gunowners into the proverbial corner. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Do You Have a Responsibility To Fight?
Top