Clamp on brake

Nimrod

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
542
Location
Missouri Ozarks
Has anyone used the Witt Machine clamp on brake and if so, how did you like it? I have a new to me XP-100R in .260 Remington that I would like to try a rifle scope on and don't particularly want to alter the factory barrel. Are there any other options out there?

Thanks in advance!
 
I have several friends who use the Witt machine brakes and they are very satisfied with their performance. I switch a Kahntrol tanker style brake back and forth between a half a dozen sporter barrels and although not very aesthetically pleasing, the recoil and barrel rise are greatly reduced including several 300 magnums.
 
Thumbs up on the Witt Machine clamp on. But I would not recommend it on a XP. The increased noise level at the shooter is going to be immense. If you are shooting off a bench you won't make any friends. The brake has a 90 degree blast.
 
I put one on a 7mmRM I didn't want to thread. Fit perfect and stayed on securely. Also cut recoil quite a bit and made the rifle much nicer to shoot. My one piece of advice is measure well and get a good solid measurement when ordering.

IMG_2181.JPG

IMG_2195.JPG
 
I used it on 44 mag encore. Even on such a large diameter bore that brake worked but it is bulky and it looked ugly. What I have noticed on mine was that it got rust all over no matter it was made out of stainless steel. Barrel is made out of stainless steel and didn't get any rust but brake did an over outer surface. I removed it. If you don't have any other option, it may be an ok option but I would rather invest money and get a properly installed brake by a good gunsmith.


As for noise level, if will be higher but you should be wearing ear protection when shooting anyway, regardless of barrel having brake or not having it.
 
Last edited:
I put one on a 7mmRM I didn't want to thread. Fit perfect and stayed on securely. Also cut recoil quite a bit and made the rifle much nicer to shoot. My one piece of advice is measure well and get a good solid measurement when ordering.

View attachment 561684
View attachment 561685
IN addition to measuring correctly, do not install it with blue loctite on the barrel! It is not necessary even though some on the internet may say so! Don't ask me how I know.
 
Has anyone used the Witt Machine clamp on brake and if so, how did you like it? I have a new to me XP-100R in .260 Remington that I would like to try a rifle scope on and don't particularly want to alter the factory barrel. Are there any other options out there?

Thanks in advance!
Not Witt but a review I wrote of the Kahntrol


I saw the other two threads about the Witt Machine brake so thought there might be some interest in an alternate version.

After looking at a number of Clamp on brakes I decided to order the Kahntrol brake. Even with exchange and postage it was cheaper than buying the Canadian equivalent. It was however quite a bit more money than the Witt Machine brake.

Kahntrol KSMB645 for muzzle diameter of .640-.675 $149.95 U.S.
Witt Machine Exact fit to the barrel measurement $89.00 U.S.
Grizzly Exact fit to barrel measurement $235.00 Canadian

One of the big reasons I chose the Kahntrol was it was the only one that was able to fit on a fairly wide range of barrel sizes, in this case from .640 - .675. It means I can use it on more than one gun. All of the other brakes were cut for the exact muzzle diameter of the specific gun barrel, accurate to .003. This makes fitting them to any other guns unlikely.


mb-kahntrol1.jpg



Kahntrol accommodates the wider range of barrel sizes by having 6 vertical tightening screws along a horizontal split. Very similar to a set of scope rings but over a much longer opening.

The brake was very easy to mount on my Left Hand 26" all Stainless Remington 700 in 7 RUM. I followed the on-line instructions and had the brake mounted, leveled and timed in about 20 minutes. I could have done it faster but I was quadruple checking everything and being very careful to ensure everything lined up perfectly so there would be no chance of baffle strikes when fired. The one thing I did different than the instructions was torque it down to 50 inch pounds rather than the 30 recommended.

This 7 RUM is my all time least favorite rifle to shoot out of the box. It didn't really recoil in the traditional sense, it was more appropriately described as a REALLY SHARP punch that even with lots of padding would give you a headache after 10 or 15 rounds. Not really surprising when you figure you are burning 95 grains of powder behind a 162 grain bullet in a gun the weighs 8.5 lbs with scope. It was far more unpleasant to shoot than my 375 or even my 460. (To be fair both of those are quite are bit heavier and the 460 has a brake on it). In fact I have never shot any other gun that was as nasty to shoot or kicked as sharply as this 7 RUM out of the box.

After installing a Mercury suppressor in the stock and a Pachmeyer decelerator pad it was comfortable to shoot but still had a very brisk recoil and quite a bit of muzzle jump. I figured this made it the perfect candidate to try the Kahntrol Brake on.

In addition to the brake, I had also mounted a new Leupold 4.5x14 B&C reticle scope for an upcoming antelope trip so the gun needed to be sighted in as well. With everything mounted and two loads that I know shot well in the RUM, 162 BTSP with 84 grains of 7828 SSC in Rem brass with Winchester mag primers at 3.60 LOA, and the same with 94.5 Grains of Retumbo, I headed to the range. (Both of these loads are pushing the 162 grain Hornady bullet north of 3300 fps) It took two shots to get the gun hitting 3" high, dead on the line at 100 yards.

With the bake on there was no difference in group size or shape at 100 or 300 yards. Both loads shot just as good as before, making 3 shot clover leafs at 100 and under 1" at 300. There was however a VERY noticeable reduction in recoil and muzzle jump. The gun felt like something between a 223 and a 243. I checked the brake after the first shot and every two or three thereafter and there was no indication of baffle strikes, as it should be. There was however carbon buildup on the barrel and brake as the number of shots increased. I checked the bolts after 20 rounds and found no decrease in torque.

I was wearing muffs and plugs, as I always do at the range and I did not notice any increase in perceived noise from the brake. I was alone so I did not have anyone to validate whether it was louder to the sides but I would be willing to bet that like all brakes it is. Also, with the amount of recoil reduction it must be pushing a pile of gas to the sides so anyone shooting beside you will definitely feel the blast, though from previous experience this gun makes a hell of a muzzle blast off to the sides even without a brake.

After 30 rounds of very slow fire I felt no soreness in my shoulder nor any other ill effects of shooting, and all I was wearing was a T shirt. I then removed the brake and fired a two shoot group. It hit exactly 1.5" left but on precisely the same elevation, exactly 3" high, as when the brake was on. I adjusted the scope and fired a three shoot clover leaf group that is exactly 3" high, dead on the line at 100 yards. There was a very noticeable increase in recoil without the brake and no perceivable reduction or difference in muzzle blast or noise.

The brake is very well made and fits to the gun well. I would never use a brake on a hunting rifle but this is a great tool for working up loads on guns that tend to beat you up. I could see absolutely no differences in the groups but this is only one gun. I will be interested to try it on a couple of other rifles to see if the results are the same. If they are I will probably order a couple more to cover other barrel sizes.

It is completely effective in reducing recoil and making heavy or medium hitting guns into pleasant to shoot rifles. For range shooting it is the cats pajamas and because it is so easy to mount and remove it is perfect for use on guns that are primarily hunting rifles as well. The POI shift is easy to adjust for when you remove the brake.

I hope the info is useful to others thinking about putting brakes on their rifles.
 
Not Witt but a review I wrote of the Kahntrol


I saw the other two threads about the Witt Machine brake so thought there might be some interest in an alternate version.

After looking at a number of Clamp on brakes I decided to order the Kahntrol brake. Even with exchange and postage it was cheaper than buying the Canadian equivalent. It was however quite a bit more money than the Witt Machine brake.

Kahntrol KSMB645 for muzzle diameter of .640-.675 $149.95 U.S.
Witt Machine Exact fit to the barrel measurement $89.00 U.S.
Grizzly Exact fit to barrel measurement $235.00 Canadian

One of the big reasons I chose the Kahntrol was it was the only one that was able to fit on a fairly wide range of barrel sizes, in this case from .640 - .675. It means I can use it on more than one gun. All of the other brakes were cut for the exact muzzle diameter of the specific gun barrel, accurate to .003. This makes fitting them to any other guns unlikely.


View attachment 561700


Kahntrol accommodates the wider range of barrel sizes by having 6 vertical tightening screws along a horizontal split. Very similar to a set of scope rings but over a much longer opening.

The brake was very easy to mount on my Left Hand 26" all Stainless Remington 700 in 7 RUM. I followed the on-line instructions and had the brake mounted, leveled and timed in about 20 minutes. I could have done it faster but I was quadruple checking everything and being very careful to ensure everything lined up perfectly so there would be no chance of baffle strikes when fired. The one thing I did different than the instructions was torque it down to 50 inch pounds rather than the 30 recommended.

This 7 RUM is my all time least favorite rifle to shoot out of the box. It didn't really recoil in the traditional sense, it was more appropriately described as a REALLY SHARP punch that even with lots of padding would give you a headache after 10 or 15 rounds. Not really surprising when you figure you are burning 95 grains of powder behind a 162 grain bullet in a gun the weighs 8.5 lbs with scope. It was far more unpleasant to shoot than my 375 or even my 460. (To be fair both of those are quite are bit heavier and the 460 has a brake on it). In fact I have never shot any other gun that was as nasty to shoot or kicked as sharply as this 7 RUM out of the box.

After installing a Mercury suppressor in the stock and a Pachmeyer decelerator pad it was comfortable to shoot but still had a very brisk recoil and quite a bit of muzzle jump. I figured this made it the perfect candidate to try the Kahntrol Brake on.

In addition to the brake, I had also mounted a new Leupold 4.5x14 B&C reticle scope for an upcoming antelope trip so the gun needed to be sighted in as well. With everything mounted and two loads that I know shot well in the RUM, 162 BTSP with 84 grains of 7828 SSC in Rem brass with Winchester mag primers at 3.60 LOA, and the same with 94.5 Grains of Retumbo, I headed to the range. (Both of these loads are pushing the 162 grain Hornady bullet north of 3300 fps) It took two shots to get the gun hitting 3" high, dead on the line at 100 yards.

With the bake on there was no difference in group size or shape at 100 or 300 yards. Both loads shot just as good as before, making 3 shot clover leafs at 100 and under 1" at 300. There was however a VERY noticeable reduction in recoil and muzzle jump. The gun felt like something between a 223 and a 243. I checked the brake after the first shot and every two or three thereafter and there was no indication of baffle strikes, as it should be. There was however carbon buildup on the barrel and brake as the number of shots increased. I checked the bolts after 20 rounds and found no decrease in torque.

I was wearing muffs and plugs, as I always do at the range and I did not notice any increase in perceived noise from the brake. I was alone so I did not have anyone to validate whether it was louder to the sides but I would be willing to bet that like all brakes it is. Also, with the amount of recoil reduction it must be pushing a pile of gas to the sides so anyone shooting beside you will definitely feel the blast, though from previous experience this gun makes a hell of a muzzle blast off to the sides even without a brake.

After 30 rounds of very slow fire I felt no soreness in my shoulder nor any other ill effects of shooting, and all I was wearing was a T shirt. I then removed the brake and fired a two shoot group. It hit exactly 1.5" left but on precisely the same elevation, exactly 3" high, as when the brake was on. I adjusted the scope and fired a three shoot clover leaf group that is exactly 3" high, dead on the line at 100 yards. There was a very noticeable increase in recoil without the brake and no perceivable reduction or difference in muzzle blast or noise.

The brake is very well made and fits to the gun well. I would never use a brake on a hunting rifle but this is a great tool for working up loads on guns that tend to beat you up. I could see absolutely no differences in the groups but this is only one gun. I will be interested to try it on a couple of other rifles to see if the results are the same. If they are I will probably order a couple more to cover other barrel sizes.

It is completely effective in reducing recoil and making heavy or medium hitting guns into pleasant to shoot rifles. For range shooting it is the cats pajamas and because it is so easy to mount and remove it is perfect for use on guns that are primarily hunting rifles as well. The POI shift is easy to adjust for when you remove the brake.

I hope the info is useful to others thinking about putting brakes on their rifles.
If you want to have a "range" of barrels you can use it on, it will affect efficiency of it.
 
Yes, but not by a whole lot. .284 or 30 cal is what it is used on and the .006 increase in the radius isn't a big deal. Now if I was using a .375 brake on a .284, that would be material.
I would agree with this statement, I have used the 30 caliber on 6.5s, 7mms, and 30 calibers, and it works great on all of them, if there is a difference, I haven't noticed any.
 
In fact , it's still in my safe but I sold the barrel , it was on a 7mm RM Criterion HS barrel . I know it's a long shot , (YUK YUK ) but it's your's for the cost of shipping if you think it will fit . I think it was around .731 , the barrel I mean .
 
Top