Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
CEB 140grn G10 MTH & 6.5 WSM-
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Outlaw6.0" data-source="post: 827251" data-attributes="member: 23486"><p>Jeff you make valid points, </p><p> </p><p>All bullet manufacturers experience failures & never has there been a 100% conclusive determination stemming from a single test.</p><p> </p><p>I'm just not that quick to turn up my nose I guess. This is the exact type of testing we need to share with the manufacturer if we want to see an improved product. </p><p> </p><p>I do understand the fact that there was no expansion for one bullet encountering two different test mediums, that is most definitely cause for concern. I guess that makes two failures (one bullet) for one test. definitely a two'fer <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p> </p><p>It looks as though there could be an issue here, it's not the end of the world & I guarantee I won't stop using the 130's due to this. I will share this info with Dan (CEB Pres) in hopes of helping to improve their product.</p><p> </p><p>I do wonder if a faster twist can have any effect in this situation. I can't say, sure couldn't hurt. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>t</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Outlaw6.0, post: 827251, member: 23486"] Jeff you make valid points, All bullet manufacturers experience failures & never has there been a 100% conclusive determination stemming from a single test. I'm just not that quick to turn up my nose I guess. This is the exact type of testing we need to share with the manufacturer if we want to see an improved product. I do understand the fact that there was no expansion for one bullet encountering two different test mediums, that is most definitely cause for concern. I guess that makes two failures (one bullet) for one test. definitely a two'fer :cool: It looks as though there could be an issue here, it's not the end of the world & I guarantee I won't stop using the 130's due to this. I will share this info with Dan (CEB Pres) in hopes of helping to improve their product. I do wonder if a faster twist can have any effect in this situation. I can't say, sure couldn't hurt. t [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
CEB 140grn G10 MTH & 6.5 WSM-
Top