Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Caribou/7mag/162 Amax?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jluck" data-source="post: 933154" data-attributes="member: 76721"><p>Best post in here! I understand the frangible bullets for terminal performance at long range but I always thought a well retained bullet with minimal hydraulic shock and a quickly dispatched animal was the goal, It is mine.</p><p></p><p>FWIW, I killed a small Muley buck at 567 yards last year, Using 168 Berger VLD's in my 7 Remington mag **** near blew animal in two. Shot was a little far back but not in guts still No tenderloins and almost no backstrap due to hydraulic shock. I was disgusted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jluck, post: 933154, member: 76721"] Best post in here! I understand the frangible bullets for terminal performance at long range but I always thought a well retained bullet with minimal hydraulic shock and a quickly dispatched animal was the goal, It is mine. FWIW, I killed a small Muley buck at 567 yards last year, Using 168 Berger VLD's in my 7 Remington mag **** near blew animal in two. Shot was a little far back but not in guts still No tenderloins and almost no backstrap due to hydraulic shock. I was disgusted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Caribou/7mag/162 Amax?
Top