Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Berger Bullets Announces Launch of a New Ammo Company
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eric Stecker" data-source="post: 983075" data-attributes="member: 8908"><p>To All,</p><p></p><p>Bryan is currently shooting in an international high power competition in Canada. He is aware of this thread and he will respond when he returns and is able to commit some time to the effort.</p><p></p><p>I expect that Bryan will be able to respond to Michael with a cooler head than I can. Michael is in my opinion one of the worst types of offenders on the forums. He is smart enough that what he says sounds reasonable.</p><p></p><p>It is the truth however that his conclusions are twisted facts. Much of his published work and posted opinions are either based on or are copied directly from Bryan's work. </p><p></p><p>The things that frankly ****es me off is that he uses this data, Bryan's data, in the same breathe when he is critical of Bryan's work.</p><p></p><p>Anyone who has poured their heart and soul into a long labor for the benefit of others in a deliberate effort to get it right can understand how frustrating it is to hear someone use that work to then question it. </p><p></p><p>I enjoy constructive criticism and we've made many advancements when someone with genuine data and intent provides us with clear evidence that we've got something wrong. What Michael does is different and his using a set of data to question the very data he is using is so hard for me to justify that I can only think of it as deliberately destructive. Why else would someone do this?</p><p></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Eric</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eric Stecker, post: 983075, member: 8908"] To All, Bryan is currently shooting in an international high power competition in Canada. He is aware of this thread and he will respond when he returns and is able to commit some time to the effort. I expect that Bryan will be able to respond to Michael with a cooler head than I can. Michael is in my opinion one of the worst types of offenders on the forums. He is smart enough that what he says sounds reasonable. It is the truth however that his conclusions are twisted facts. Much of his published work and posted opinions are either based on or are copied directly from Bryan's work. The things that frankly ****es me off is that he uses this data, Bryan's data, in the same breathe when he is critical of Bryan's work. Anyone who has poured their heart and soul into a long labor for the benefit of others in a deliberate effort to get it right can understand how frustrating it is to hear someone use that work to then question it. I enjoy constructive criticism and we've made many advancements when someone with genuine data and intent provides us with clear evidence that we've got something wrong. What Michael does is different and his using a set of data to question the very data he is using is so hard for me to justify that I can only think of it as deliberately destructive. Why else would someone do this? Regards, Eric [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Berger Bullets Announces Launch of a New Ammo Company
Top