Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes LRX bullets in 6.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JMB 1911" data-source="post: 1753372" data-attributes="member: 109501"><p>There has been a lot of talk here about the Hornady ELD-X VS the Nosler Accubond in 6.5. Does anyone have experience with LRX or does the fact that it is lighter and has a lower BC simply make it not practical for the 6.5?</p><p></p><p>Does anyone know why Barnes doesn't offer a heavier bullet in 6.5? It seems to me that they are missing one of main features of the 6.5 which is a very long heavy for caliber bullet. With there 127 grain bullet I am way better off just to shoot my .270 for longer ranges.</p><p></p><p>Am I missing something</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JMB 1911, post: 1753372, member: 109501"] There has been a lot of talk here about the Hornady ELD-X VS the Nosler Accubond in 6.5. Does anyone have experience with LRX or does the fact that it is lighter and has a lower BC simply make it not practical for the 6.5? Does anyone know why Barnes doesn't offer a heavier bullet in 6.5? It seems to me that they are missing one of main features of the 6.5 which is a very long heavy for caliber bullet. With there 127 grain bullet I am way better off just to shoot my .270 for longer ranges. Am I missing something [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Barnes LRX bullets in 6.5
Top