Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Badger Ordanance action !!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fiftydriver" data-source="post: 227126" data-attributes="member: 10"><p>I am sure it will be a strong and rugged receiver like all BO products but I have to wonder about a couple things.</p><p> </p><p>- Why so bulky?</p><p> </p><p>- Why not an integral rail base?</p><p> </p><p>- Why go with that multi-plane bolt lug design?</p><p> </p><p>- Why go with a flat bottom receiver? At least it does appear to have draft angles on the side of the receiver which will greatly aid in bedding ease.</p><p> </p><p>I am certain there were reasons for all my questions as to why they did what they did, just hope the same issues with the MkV wby receiver does not come and bite BO in the rear!!!</p><p> </p><p>It is a hell for stout looking receiver though and I am sure they will make a hell of a shooter!!! The tactical boys like alot of weight in their rifles so this is probably why weight was not a concern.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fiftydriver, post: 227126, member: 10"] I am sure it will be a strong and rugged receiver like all BO products but I have to wonder about a couple things. - Why so bulky? - Why not an integral rail base? - Why go with that multi-plane bolt lug design? - Why go with a flat bottom receiver? At least it does appear to have draft angles on the side of the receiver which will greatly aid in bedding ease. I am certain there were reasons for all my questions as to why they did what they did, just hope the same issues with the MkV wby receiver does not come and bite BO in the rear!!! It is a hell for stout looking receiver though and I am sure they will make a hell of a shooter!!! The tactical boys like alot of weight in their rifles so this is probably why weight was not a concern. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Badger Ordanance action !!
Top