Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Applied Ballistics Mobile app
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Loris" data-source="post: 1186347" data-attributes="member: 92379"><p>Hello. X I would like to know who has tried it is more effective to have the g7 br2 and enter the wind. or have rangefinder standard sigsauer kilo in 2000, and match Kestrel 5400 with ballistic application? ATTENTION I HAVE TRIED MANY READINGS 1600B LEICA AND ARE ALWAYS LESS THAN WHEN YOU WANT AND YOU HAVE THE MEASURE HORIZONTAL ANGLE OF SITE. MEASURES FOR ME IS NOT RELIABLE .With LORIS ITALY</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Loris, post: 1186347, member: 92379"] Hello. X I would like to know who has tried it is more effective to have the g7 br2 and enter the wind. or have rangefinder standard sigsauer kilo in 2000, and match Kestrel 5400 with ballistic application? ATTENTION I HAVE TRIED MANY READINGS 1600B LEICA AND ARE ALWAYS LESS THAN WHEN YOU WANT AND YOU HAVE THE MEASURE HORIZONTAL ANGLE OF SITE. MEASURES FOR ME IS NOT RELIABLE .With LORIS ITALY [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Applied Ballistics Mobile app
Top