Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any Tips for a New Loadbase User?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigngreen" data-source="post: 393169" data-attributes="member: 13632"><p>The manual references sight in conditions as the enviro conditions that are present at sight in and field conditions are different from sight in conditions. You only use the standard enviro only if altitude is the only know parameter the standard conditions are always reference with only knowing the altitude.</p><p>There is a table for correcting the BC to ICAO form Std Metro but that is it.</p><p></p><p>The longest range corrections I have done have been closer to the ICOA standard but far enough of that it should have been at least a few MOA of if I was not using the correct data, a 1/10 of a MOA at over 2200yrds is fairly close.</p><p></p><p>I tweeked the sight hight to 2.1 and the sight in hight to .5 and no mater how I do it I get 20.2 MOA. Both ways. </p><p></p><p>This is really bugging me, I thought I was getting the hang of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigngreen, post: 393169, member: 13632"] The manual references sight in conditions as the enviro conditions that are present at sight in and field conditions are different from sight in conditions. You only use the standard enviro only if altitude is the only know parameter the standard conditions are always reference with only knowing the altitude. There is a table for correcting the BC to ICAO form Std Metro but that is it. The longest range corrections I have done have been closer to the ICOA standard but far enough of that it should have been at least a few MOA of if I was not using the correct data, a 1/10 of a MOA at over 2200yrds is fairly close. I tweeked the sight hight to 2.1 and the sight in hight to .5 and no mater how I do it I get 20.2 MOA. Both ways. This is really bugging me, I thought I was getting the hang of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any Tips for a New Loadbase User?
Top