Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
A Good Jumping Point
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dWeller" data-source="post: 190185" data-attributes="member: 2745"><p>I don't need a 3 lug action, I just like the short bolt throw and it would be something different from what I already have. The same goes for the 330 Dakota round. I was well aware of the ballistical inferiority of the round when I was considering it, but honestly I don't need all that extra "Horsepower" of the other rounds. I'm only going on assumption when I say this, but I like the fact that it uses less powder(I already have one big powder burner and another on the way) and I would think therefore it should have less recoil. So I'm thinkin' maybe a brake wouldn't be necessary? </p><p></p><p>Would a 26" barrel be enough length to milk the extra velocity out of it also?</p><p>I know a longer one would have to be heavier which means more weight.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the reply, I'm going to check out those other actions and widen my options a little.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dWeller, post: 190185, member: 2745"] I don't need a 3 lug action, I just like the short bolt throw and it would be something different from what I already have. The same goes for the 330 Dakota round. I was well aware of the ballistical inferiority of the round when I was considering it, but honestly I don't need all that extra "Horsepower" of the other rounds. I'm only going on assumption when I say this, but I like the fact that it uses less powder(I already have one big powder burner and another on the way) and I would think therefore it should have less recoil. So I'm thinkin' maybe a brake wouldn't be necessary? Would a 26" barrel be enough length to milk the extra velocity out of it also? I know a longer one would have to be heavier which means more weight. Thanks for the reply, I'm going to check out those other actions and widen my options a little. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
A Good Jumping Point
Top