cwatson308
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2012
- Messages
- 27
So quick question, what is considered to short? I know there are many factors involved but I'm curious if say 20" barrels would have a good amount of powder waisted.
By waisted powder I'm in sorts referencing loss of potential velocity. I understand that its a personal preference boiling down to the convenience of having a shorter barrel vs velocity loss. Im selling a new 7prc 22" built barreled action to finish a 338 build that I'm currently working on, but soon after I will be looking into another 7prc build. May go longer and may go shorter. 18" is very tempting though!What's your objective? Your post leads me to believe your objective is to not waste powder. Who cares?
My objective was short as possible while getting 2700fps from 180ELDMs. I went 18". Achieved my goal and all that wasted powder puts a huge smile on my face.
Cuz young guys have figured out its not 1960, and modern high BC bullets don't care if they're traveling 200 fps less from an 18" barrel wearing a suppressor.As an Old guy, I find it hard to understand WHY anyone, would take a FINE Cartridge like, a 7 PRC going 3,000 FPS, Chop Bbl, and, MAKE,..
almost a,.. .30-30 out of, IT,.. SMH
Cuz young guys have figured out its not 1960, and modern high BC bullets don't care if they're traveling 200 fps less from an 18" barrel wearing a suppressor.
And at the end of the day saving your hearing while enjoying stupid light recoil is worth that extra 150 yards of max effective range.
Give up about 100 fps going from a 24" to a 20" barrel length, makes it handier with a 7" suppressor.Why intentionally give up 200 fps when it's so easy to have.
And hearing protection is cheap.
Give up about 100 fps going from a 24" to a 20" barrel length, makes it handier with a 7" suppressor.
Once you lose your hearing due to muzzle blast, no amount of money can buy it back...