Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Long Time Long Ranger" data-source="post: 433890" data-attributes="member: 505"><p>I have had my 264 stw for 11 or so years and shot many rounds through it and it still shoots good. I shoot the 130 grain scirrocos at over 3500 fps with it. It is a wicked long range 6.5 if that is what you are after. My wife was busting rocks at over 1000 yards with my 264 win mag and she likes it best. Says she can hold it more accurate with the less recoil. I like all of them. Just the faster ones are better on long range animals.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Long Time Long Ranger, post: 433890, member: 505"] I have had my 264 stw for 11 or so years and shot many rounds through it and it still shoots good. I shoot the 130 grain scirrocos at over 3500 fps with it. It is a wicked long range 6.5 if that is what you are after. My wife was busting rocks at over 1000 yards with my 264 win mag and she likes it best. Says she can hold it more accurate with the less recoil. I like all of them. Just the faster ones are better on long range animals. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag
Top