Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300gn Scenar at 2700 yards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BountyHunter" data-source="post: 395828" data-attributes="member: 12"><p>Phorwath</p><p> </p><p>I certainly understand your reluctance to factually respond. I would be embarrassed too if caught like you. </p><p> </p><p>Contrary to your post, I went back and quoted your previous posts and comments. Anyone can go back and read them. Hardly call that unsubstantiated even if you try to deny now, which you obviously are.</p><p> </p><p>They stand as you said them and they said nothing about journalists until recently. That is unless you want to go in and delete them.</p><p> </p><p>You can backpedal and try to discount them, but they are what you said. </p><p> </p><p>You can attack me and go ahead, my beef is with what was said and has been very readily implied all along. That takes no mind reading, it is super clear.</p><p> </p><p>Your reluctance to even admit that it can be done and has been duplicated says more than anything else. Blind obediance and loyalty is really chilling watching. But then, that is your cross to bear, not mine.</p><p> </p><p>You seem to think that as you put it a public debate on what happened in somehow actually supports the military. I can tell you with 100 percent certainty it does not and they absolutey despise those that think it does. It is most certainly an attack on them. That is your biggest and most egregious fault in this. Somehow you really think it helps.</p><p> </p><p>BH</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BountyHunter, post: 395828, member: 12"] Phorwath I certainly understand your reluctance to factually respond. I would be embarrassed too if caught like you. Contrary to your post, I went back and quoted your previous posts and comments. Anyone can go back and read them. Hardly call that unsubstantiated even if you try to deny now, which you obviously are. They stand as you said them and they said nothing about journalists until recently. That is unless you want to go in and delete them. You can backpedal and try to discount them, but they are what you said. You can attack me and go ahead, my beef is with what was said and has been very readily implied all along. That takes no mind reading, it is super clear. Your reluctance to even admit that it can be done and has been duplicated says more than anything else. Blind obediance and loyalty is really chilling watching. But then, that is your cross to bear, not mine. You seem to think that as you put it a public debate on what happened in somehow actually supports the military. I can tell you with 100 percent certainty it does not and they absolutey despise those that think it does. It is most certainly an attack on them. That is your biggest and most egregious fault in this. Somehow you really think it helps. BH [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300gn Scenar at 2700 yards
Top