Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
264 Win Mag VS 270 Whby
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="backwoods83" data-source="post: 666264" data-attributes="member: 29890"><p>Just a thought, I'm a big 6.5 fan, not so much so with the 264wm, but I will say that the 270 roy with a 28" barrel will blister a .496 bc 140 accubond out at over 3500fps, when I had mine, my accuracy load was at 3430 and was far from being maxed out. I think the 264wm is a horrible design, the case is to long, shoulder to shallow, and the neck is to short, which means crappy charge density unless you use powders like H870, WC872, AA8700, or US869 and none of those are well known to be stable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="backwoods83, post: 666264, member: 29890"] Just a thought, I'm a big 6.5 fan, not so much so with the 264wm, but I will say that the 270 roy with a 28" barrel will blister a .496 bc 140 accubond out at over 3500fps, when I had mine, my accuracy load was at 3430 and was far from being maxed out. I think the 264wm is a horrible design, the case is to long, shoulder to shallow, and the neck is to short, which means crappy charge density unless you use powders like H870, WC872, AA8700, or US869 and none of those are well known to be stable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
264 Win Mag VS 270 Whby
Top