Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
185 Vs. 210 Berger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="liltank" data-source="post: 602381" data-attributes="member: 13275"><p>Normally I would go 210 (which I still support), but after watching E.O.L. on the sportsman channel, I don't think you'll be under gunned to 1000 with 185's pushed as fast as they can go accurately from your rifle. They are using a 300RUM and 30-378 McMillan rifles dumping Gemsbock, Black and Blue Wildebeest at ranges from 800 to 925yds. Granted the Wildebeest required 2 shots... it put some faith in me and the abilities of that bullet. However, nothing wrong going with the 210, 215, or 230 grain Berger.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="liltank, post: 602381, member: 13275"] Normally I would go 210 (which I still support), but after watching E.O.L. on the sportsman channel, I don't think you'll be under gunned to 1000 with 185's pushed as fast as they can go accurately from your rifle. They are using a 300RUM and 30-378 McMillan rifles dumping Gemsbock, Black and Blue Wildebeest at ranges from 800 to 925yds. Granted the Wildebeest required 2 shots... it put some faith in me and the abilities of that bullet. However, nothing wrong going with the 210, 215, or 230 grain Berger. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
185 Vs. 210 Berger
Top