Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
168lrx 280ai or 284win in long action?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ruby76" data-source="post: 1585157" data-attributes="member: 95995"><p>In my 280AI (original spec) I've been using winchester nickel plated 280 brass for years. No issues with fire forming and it has held up to several loadings.</p><p></p><p>I did try the 168 LRX in my 9.25 twist as a test, not even close to stabilizing (and they are waaay long for my Ruger M77 mag box). I've always used 140 or 150 barnes, lately using 145 LRX with extremely good results. RL22 has always shot very good in my rifle but I want to do some more experimenting with temp stable powders.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ruby76, post: 1585157, member: 95995"] In my 280AI (original spec) I've been using winchester nickel plated 280 brass for years. No issues with fire forming and it has held up to several loadings. I did try the 168 LRX in my 9.25 twist as a test, not even close to stabilizing (and they are waaay long for my Ruger M77 mag box). I've always used 140 or 150 barnes, lately using 145 LRX with extremely good results. RL22 has always shot very good in my rifle but I want to do some more experimenting with temp stable powders. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
168lrx 280ai or 284win in long action?
Top