Which bullets?

Discussion in 'Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics' started by Billy Rainmaker, Jan 22, 2004.

  1. Billy Rainmaker

    Billy Rainmaker Member

    Messages:
    13
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2003
    Which bullets would you prefer for long range hunting for 300WM?
     
  2. Brent

    Brent Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,537
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2001
    210 Berger, JLK or 200 Accubond.
     
  3. *WyoWhisper*

    *WyoWhisper* Guest

    200 Accubond or 190 SMK!
     
  4. BountyHunter

    BountyHunter Writers Guild

    Messages:
    4,811
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    The 200 gr SMK is one of the most consistent in quality out of the box bullets.

    BH
     
  5. winmagman

    winmagman Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,379
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Another 200 gr. Accubond vote
     
  6. Michael Eichele

    Michael Eichele Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,848
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Depending on what I was hunting, the 175 SMK, 178 AMAX, 190 SMK.
     
  7. Varmint Hunter

    Varmint Hunter Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,529
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2001
    Make me the third to cast a vote for the Accubond. [​IMG]

    VH
     
  8. deergrunt

    deergrunt Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    90
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    For Deer------->A-MAX!!
     
  9. Kevin

    Kevin Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    259
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    190 SMK, inexpensive, accurate, and very very deadly.
     
  10. remingtonman_25_06

    remingtonman_25_06 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,032
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    180g Nosler Ballistic Tip for deer, 200gAccubond for elk/bears.
     
  11. Mysticplayer

    Mysticplayer Writers Guild

    Messages:
    1,459
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    In Europe, availability becomes a problem for some of the stuff we have in NA.

    If availability is good then:
    Hornady SST, Accubond, then Amax
    Sierra: matchking
    Nosler: Ballistic tip, Accubond
    Lapua: Scenar should work well too at LR

    I guess you need to determine what LR means to you, the impact vel, the size of the game, and the parameters of your rifle. The question was pretty vague but you still have lots of good choices in this post.

    Just try and keep impact vel in the 1500fps or higher, then any of these bullets will work just fine. If impact vel will be lower, then go for the AMax or other thinly constructed match bullet.

    Jerry
     
  12. winmagman

    winmagman Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,379
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Brown Dog
    One of the deer I shot this year was at 42 yds. She was quartering slightly towards me, I hit her just behind the front shoulder and exited near the back of the rib cage. Normal sized entrance wound, and the exit wound was about the size of a golf ball give or take a 1/2 inch. Bullet was a 200 gr. Accubond, Rifle a 300 win mag., and velocity around 2850. They work just fine unless you shoot through both shoulders (tried that too)then things get a little messy, but still not ghastly.
    Chris
     
  13. Brown Dog

    Brown Dog Writers Guild

    Messages:
    635
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    I'm getting like a stuck record asking these questions regarding the 'target' bullets; but what are you all doing with these rounds when a deer pops up at less than 200m? turning down the shot? or are they non 'explosive' at short range 300WM velocities?

    On a <200m shot, broadside through the ribs and top of the heart, what kind of exit wound size would be typical ?

    About a week ago I posted that I had 2 x deer with hand span size exit wounds at 150 and 160m with quartering behind the shoulder chest shots -with 180gr Sierra prohunter bullets. This was disappointingly explosive and a lot of meat was spoilt. What would a target bullet have done? Made a through-and through-pencil hole or 'detonated'?

    I want to be convinced, but I'm having trouble making the 'leap of faith' to give them a go! Do these target bullets have a 'minimum effective range'?
     
  14. Brown Dog

    Brown Dog Writers Guild

    Messages:
    635
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    WinMagMan,

    Thanks, but I'm keen to know what sort of damage is generated by the much-vaunted HPBTs at short range. I'm keen to try them but wary of the fact that the promoters of HPBTs for hunting seem to regard them as a solution to all situations; whereas, rightly or wrongly, my logic tells me that if they're expanding well at long range they must surely 'detonate' at shorter (<200m) range.

    I'd love to use Accubonds, but they're going to run at around $70 for 50 when they eventually arrive in my part of the world (which they haven't yet). I'm sure you'd agree that that'd be fine if I was trophy shooting on a paid hunt, but the vast majority of my shooting is cull/meat hunting.

    I'm still surprised by the damage a conventional 180gr SP did at 150m (the 300WM is a new caliber to me, only used my 308 before). I was going to reload it with 180BTs, but if conventional SPs are explosive on a broadside rib-heart-rib shot I think that that may not be a clever next step!

    Right now I'm stuck. Interbonds are available here, but only to 165gr in 308 - I think that's too light for a 300. Swift Sciroccos are available (around$80!); I tried those in my 308 a couple of years back but they were wildly inaccurate (dimensions and weight varied greatly too) I've never decided whether I simply had a bad batch -but they're too expensive to give them a second chance.

    Practically, therefore, my choices narrow to:

    180gr conventional SPs -and limiting myself to neck shots under 200m -which means I'd often have to turn down shots that weren't 'just right'.

    or trying a HPBT such as SMK

    (I have 80rds of Fed Prem Safari 200 Trophy Bonded Bear Claw in the cupboard -but reckon they'll be a little too much for deer!)

    But I still don't understand whether the HPBT will be more or less explosive than a conventional SP!?

    [ 01-24-2004: Message edited by: Brown Dog ]