Vertical drift from crosswinds

Oli

Member
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
10
I've tried to get info about this in many other forums, but noone seems to be able to give me any concrete advice.

There is quite a lot of literature written on the topic, I know that. But I'm not willing to spend 50$ for that info only. Now I'm asking you people, that apparently do quite a lot of shooting at long ranges. How do I estimate the vertical drift component of crosswinds?

[ 05-07-2003: Message edited by: Oli ]
 

Oli

Member
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
10
Excellent! Thanks Brent!

Neither of them, Michael. Vertical drift from crosswinds.

[ 05-08-2003: Message edited by: Oli ]
 

Mysticplayer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2001
Messages
1,459
Oli, the only way that a crosswind can impose a vertical component is if the wind is flowing upwards (thermal) or downwards (wind shear). These are usually not something that happens to any large degree over most flat ranges.

If you are shooting in the mountains or over/near valleys, you will have to use wind flags and learn through experience. The math is way too complicated because you have so many possible vectors.

For windage, both side and head/tail, the affect is treated as a single variable leading to a single adjustment. Quartering winds rising or falling or swirling would probably need a NASA engineer to guess at.

Best advice is to practise. Each cal/cartridge/bullet/barrel has its own special characteristics and real world shooting will give you more info then any computer modeling. Too many variables to compute. Plus the info inputed would not be complete or accurate for a different range.

This is not a cope out, just a fact. As a rule, we don't give crosswinds any vertical stringing component. Vertical stringing comes from head/tail winds, poor loads, poor recoil control, and /or boiling mirage.

Jerry
 

Oli

Member
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
10
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>This is not a cope out, just a fact. As a rule, we don't give crosswinds any vertical stringing component. Vertical stringing comes from head/tail winds, poor loads, poor recoil control, and /or boiling mirage.

Jerry
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

It's not really vertically stringed groups I'm talking about. That's a completely different story.

I've seen some tendencies to the vertical-drift-from-crosswind phenomenon. It is of course no conclusion I've done from analysing one wind drifted round only. As you know, there are way too may other factors that can explain one drifted round. But there seems to be a tendency for it when looking at many groups shot in crosswinds. There are however no greater differences and I would definately not worry about in hunting situations. Nevertheless, it's an interesting phenomenon that has drawn my attention away from far more important things for some time now.

Now I have finally got my hands on these precious pages from Vaughn that have become almost mythical (is that a word?) by now. So don't ruin my fun
.

Even though it seems hard to predict the vertical component, I'm looking forward to read more about it. Hopefully, I will become better at analysing groups. At least there will be one more factor to blame


[ 05-08-2003: Message edited by: Oli ]
 

Brent

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2001
Messages
2,537
Location
Palmer, Alaska
Oli,
the rest of the book is just as good and better too, well worth the money. I'm sure you have the basic idea from that part though.
 

STL_Shooter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
189
Location
St. Louis
Oli, I'll second Brent's advice and suggest you read Harold Vaughn's book. You won't go astray with Harold at your side.
 

MAX

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2001
Messages
263
As I recall, Vaughn implies that without going into great detail. Robert McCoy goes into it in more detail than I can understand after one read, but the mathematical formulas are included for all aspiring rocket scientists. It is a small value thing, perhaps on the order of Spin Drift calculation which is also proportional to GS. His book is "Modern Exterior Ballistics", available from Amazon.Com for about $95.00.
 

Trending threads

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top