The Juenke I.C.C.

CK,

Thanks for the area code info. I did get the new one from a web search earlier and left him a message. Thanks again for the help.
smile.gif
 
Brent

His manual will not list the instructons for checking cases I do not believe. Read my original post and remember must be fireformed and not resized. I have seen that proven without a doubt that it works for cases.

I keep my calibration bullets and cases in little plastic tubes with the Juenke reading on them and it is easy to recalibrate the machine to that bullet/case reading so that your bullets from different lots or batches will read the same as a previous lot.

Be interested in seeing what you come up with as far as the validity of what Vern claims his machine will do.

BH

[ 06-23-2003: Message edited by: BountyHunter ]
 
BH,

The manual has the info on the cases, pretty interesting read too, you want me to send you the pages related to cases or the whole manual, let me know. I think the manual is well written and spells things out really well for a guy that doesn't even comprehend what's setting in front of him. Once you read them, it all becomes all too simple. I explained and showed my Dad how to use it in less than two or three minutes.

Here's some thoughts and data for some bullets I tested that I sent to Len in an email, I thought I already posted it here too... whoops!!
smile.gif



More later, but so far the 200gr Accubonds all tested under 9 DU's on the shank, half were under 4 DU's, the other half were 8 DU.... not bad, I thought. The 178 A-Max's I checked were in the same range too. All 10 .338 300gr SMK's I checked were all less than 3 DU's.

I've made a couple observations so far; A couple things can cause higher DU readings than it really is because of the tip or base length variations can cause the bullet to move left or right on the balls varying the distance to the detector head if it is not level, as with testing boattails or ogives. If it was not distance sensitive, this would not matter but, it is and is something to consider.

I thought of making an vertically adjustable stop that fastened to the originals lock-down screw that would center on the bullet bases axis to elliminate it from riding the stop on the heal of the boattail, this would keep the heal irregularities from influencing the distance to the detector, as it should remain stable from lft to right.

With the bullet tip to the left against the stop and setting at quite an angle to test ogives, I can see no way to correct for variations in irregular tip length like you get with the SMK bullets.

So many ways to sort them all, a guy might end up with many, many DU batches in just one box of a hundred.
 
brent

Dave Tooley sells a tool ($40) that cuts the bullet tips/metplats uniform and true based on a distance up off the ogive. They are caliber specific, ie 6mm, 6.5, 7mm, 30 and 338 and not interchangable. Steve Shelp uses them and likes them a lot, particularily on the 338. That would allow you to get the uniform distance you are talking about if you wanted to go tip to the left.

As for so many DU units, now you see why guys who use these do it in lots of at least 1000 bullets in order to get quantities in each group. However, you might try other bullets, think you will find that the SMK is all over the chart, while the JLK and Berger are better, with the JLK being best.

Way I have always seen it done is to use calibration bullet and base to left, then calibrate the machine for the calibration bullet to set the norm of the group. Most guys using them end up with 6-8 groups on bergers and a handfull out of oddballs and max 2-3 DU groups with JLK. Sierra can end up with 10-15 groups as routine. They tend to sort by groups of 5 units, ie DU 11-15, 16-20, 21-25 etc.

BH

Brent

Buddy of mine just finished spinning 1000 Clinch River 216s (30 cal) and max deviation was 3 DU. Best he has ever spun. 95% were within 1 DU he said.

[ 06-24-2003: Message edited by: BountyHunter ]
 
Roy,

When I researched these a few years back I learned Juenke was no longer manufacturing these units. A person would have to pick up a used one from someone that's getting out of the reloading hobby. They sounded pretty neat - but expensive. It would be fun to pick a used one up at a discount at some time or another.
 
BH, why is it do you suppose that cases with thickness variance(as the machine shows) would throw shots?
Just seems odd, when so many competitors tout about no turn chambers, and implications that TIR matters little. This is all thickness variance leads to as far as I know.

I have a Juenke, but simply measure case thickness variance at the necks with a mic when culling. Any there runs full length.
I figure I'll use the juenke for bullets -when it's appropriate to do so.
Wish I was there....
 
Roy,

When I researched these a few years back I learned Juenke was no longer manufacturing these units. A person would have to pick up a used one from someone that's getting out of the reloading hobby. They sounded pretty neat - but expensive. It would be fun to pick a used one up at a discount at some time or another.


I was lead to understand that his son was carrying on the manufacture?

Different people used them for cases, jackets and bullets.

I need to do some QC on jackets and was wondering about how to best go about it..
 
You may be correct. Here's a link to The Accuracy Den, source of the units, but their link to pricing says "Please contact us for current price, availability and shipping rates."

The Accuracy Den
 
Seeing this thread led me to wondering about how the juenke machine works. I bought one abut 10 years ago and experimented with it some. About all I learned from it at the time was that the better quality bullets I was using gave lower reading than cheaper bullets. I ran a few hundred Berger and Sierra jacketed match bullets and some Lost River turned solids on it. There was some small variation in angular postion with just about all bullets I tried, but i never saw any with variations that I though I could use for sorting.

In the Juenke liturature there was mention of "ultrasonic" and I though the tests were acoustic using ultrasoinc vibration to sense deviation between bullets. This thread got me thinking about how the Juenke test set really works, so I drug out some test equipment and made measurements. Basically the Juenke is similar to a metal detector used to locate coins. It has CW oscillator running at close to 200 kilohertz connected to a 3 lead inductor sitting just below the bullet. The waveform is sinusoidal and unmodulated. I didn't measure the power of the oscillator, but it's probably around a hundred milliwatts A bullet or any metallic object set above the coil will change the coupling and thus the output amplitude from the coil. the switch and two potentiometers on the front panel just balance the meter to show a small portion of the total range of possible output. None of the knobs adjust sensitivity, only offset.

The device (bullet, case, or whatever) being tested rests on four fixed hard ball bearings which , along with a position stop form a kinematic mount. four points on the surface of cylinder will accurately locate the centerline of a cylinder without clamping. A motor with an elastic roller is lowered onto the upper surface of the object to turn it abuot the cylinder's axis. This allows checking if the object has radial symmetry, at least as seen by the inductor. The motor is adjustable up to about 1 revolution per second. It is not any kind of static or dynamic balance test. There are two additional steel balls. I assume their function is to make it easier to remove bullets being tested
or perhaps if you want to check the symmetry of the ogive or boattail relative to the shank.

What can the Juenke really sense? First its sensitive to the diameter of the cylinder. A smaller cylinder will lay closer to the detector. That will show up as a change in the meter when the cylinder is placed on the machine. It's sensitive to the conductivity of the object. Bullets from different manufacturers may have slightly different conductivity even for identical dimenstions based on the alloy. Coatings such as moly have no effect that I can detect. The reading is affected by the thickness of the material. At 200 khz the skin effect is incomplete. To test this I placed large area brass shim about as thick as a cartridge wall over the sensor, then lowered a second smaller shim over than but not allowing them to touch. The meter moved a couple of divisions before the two pieces made contact indicating that it was sensing the second shim though the first. However a lead block (much less conductive) was barely detectable. Those tests don't require rotating the device being tested.

When a cylinder (case or bullet) is rotated, the set is sensitive to any surface irregularities, to most shapes of surface distortion, and no doubt to variation in the wall or jacket thickness even if it's internal to the portion of the cylinder which is above the inductor. I do not believe it is capable of detecting voids in the core of a jacketed bullet, at least not in the presence of the typical 1 to 3 points of meter movement seen in most bullets.

I did run enough tests to convince myself that the Juenke is not making acoustic ultrasonic tests. The only thing "ultrasonic" about it that some people call any signal between about 20 khz and 1mhz as ultrasonic whether electrical or acoustic. The Juenke does not appear to have significant capacitive coupling as adding a dielecric under the test object does not change the reading. I was not able to make measurements on ceramic or plastic cylinders.

The circuitry is all analog using discrete components. The only IC is a voltage regulator. The unit has little drift, at least not enough to be annoying. Testing an object takes 5 to ten seconds to load, watch the meter for one revolution, remove the test sample and sort or record something The unit has no electrical output to connect to a computer, but I don't think it would be difficult to add.

In general I do not believe the Juenke does a definitive good/bad tests on bullets or cases. Having good readings on the Juenke does not prove a bullet with shoot well. I do think that testing sample batches of bullets can show ones which have more internal or external variations. I do not believe it will show up bullets which may have internal voids or unbalances in the lead core. Sorting batches of bullets and rejecting those with large variations in the reading when rotated or with high or low average readings may weed out some potential "fllyers" but I doubt though it is capable of detecting all defects in bullets. I believe that acoustic ultrasonic tests could do better, but the equipment would likely be even more expensive.

For those who haven't seen a Juenke, here's one inside and out. This one is about ten years old and a bit worn but working ok.
dsc00073.jpg

dsc00072.jpg
 
Last edited:
It's purpose is to expose relative thickness variance in bullet jackets, right?
Sounds like just the tool to do that to me.

Contact ultrasonics would go a few steps further(void detection, actual thickness measurement). But that would remove indication/affects of runout, which the juenke is also sensitive to by proximity.
I don't know..
The Juenke would be tough to beat for the money, and our use.
 
Lou,

Very good description.

If I had one I would use it. As I don't it's going to be measure, measure and measure some more. Then shoot the suckers and see if they work.:rolleyes:
 
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top