Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Testing the 142 LR Accubond
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stomp442" data-source="post: 1093578" data-attributes="member: 70571"><p>Wow 3 MOA difference with a lighter bullet is impressive although not surprising since BCs are virtually identical. It would seem as though Nosler needs to go back to the drawing board with this one if all they can get is a .550 BC. That is no different than their CC bullet which has a Litz measured BC of .550 as well. An interesting test would be to shoot a custom comp bullet at those ranges and see if there is any significant difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stomp442, post: 1093578, member: 70571"] Wow 3 MOA difference with a lighter bullet is impressive although not surprising since BCs are virtually identical. It would seem as though Nosler needs to go back to the drawing board with this one if all they can get is a .550 BC. That is no different than their CC bullet which has a Litz measured BC of .550 as well. An interesting test would be to shoot a custom comp bullet at those ranges and see if there is any significant difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Testing the 142 LR Accubond
Top