Test for true BC's

G

Guest

Guest
Test for true BC\'s

I was wondering if this would work.....

1. Zero Rifle for 100 Yards
2. Shoot for center of 100, 200, 300 & 400 Yard Targets.
3. Measure Muzzle Velocity while doing so.
4. Measure the drops.
5. Put MV and stated BC into ballistic program then keep adjusting BC until the ballistics program matches my actual drops.

Would this be an accurate way to determine true BC?

Also, would my drop charts be accurate past the ranges I shot? (in this case 400 yards)
Or, would the BC change from the bullet slowing down?
 

Brent

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2001
Messages
2,537
Location
Palmer, Alaska
Re: Test for true BC\'s

John,
It depends on what bullet your shooting and the drag curve it follows more closely, but it will work just like you decribe.

I found one thing I don't like about my handhelds balistic program, it uses only the G1 drag curve and does not give you the option to use any of the others or multible BCs as the Oehler program does. As a result many bullets will start to fly flatter at range than the program predicts when it follows fine out to 400 yards or so.

After you shoot out to 1000-1500 yards or so you should have an idea of what BC is working well through what distance ranges. For accurate charts I use 5 shot groups at each range interval to see a good group center.

In my experience the chart will deviate at longer ranges than actual drop using the G1 curve so the BC on the program will need to be modified to follow actual shot data. Very time consuming task but necessary, with many changing variables like temp, inclination angle etc they should be verified as well to be sure the program predicts drop accuratly with a different input changes. One reason to find a good bullet and stick with IT.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Re: Test for true BC\'s

What I'm going to do this spring (besides open a 1000 yard indoor range
)
is to shoot my 338 lapua and my 7mm stw out to 1000 in 100 yd increments. Then I will do what I mentioned with the BC to figure out how the BC changes out to 1000 as well as the first 400.

Sometimes its good to be Obsessive Compulsive
 
G

Guest

Guest
Re: Test for true BC\'s

[ 07-12-2003: Message edited by: S1 ]
 
G

Guest

Guest
Re: Test for true BC\'s

S1, sounds like I should buy the Oehler 43 ballistics Lab instead of just the model 35 chrono.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Re: Test for true BC\'s

[ 07-12-2003: Message edited by: S1 ]
 

Trending threads

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top