Curious on glass clarity between these 2 options. I have the nl pure 12x and I love them but hate bringing and range finder. How does the glass compare?
-
If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here
Swarovski EL Range TA vs Nl Pure Glass
- Thread starter Dirt_Nap
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
Nl are much better
Much!
gr8fuldoug
Official LRH Sponsor
The optics of the NL Pure are superior, plus you also lose about 5% optical quality in any rangefinder binocular due to the rangefinder in the right eyepiece
colohunter
Active Member
following, thinking of going NL's plus a range finder, even though it's two pieces in my kit
shooters
Well-Known Member
NL for sure. I started with the TA's and just couldn't get past the fact the NL's were that much better. So I sold the TA's.
mackgee
Well-Known Member
The NL's just have that edge to edge quality that the TA's can't match. Honestly you don't see it when you first look through the TA's, but if you do a side by side comparison you can see it pretty blatantly. I think it's important to remember that these were not made to compete with each other, they serve two whole different purposes. The NL is just for pure glassing, whereas the TA's try to give you some glassing qualities and serve as a rangefinder. This is not an apple's to apple's comparison at all.
So what can we compare? We can compare the quality of the image between the two and then decide if it's worth giving a little to get something else. When looking at the center of the image, you couldn't convince me that you can see a true difference. I'm certain there is a mathematical difference in resolution, transmission, and clarity, but not one that my eye can tell. I don't think you are losing much, if anything, by going with the TA's vs. the NL's when just comparing the centered image. As previously stated the NL's edge-to-edge clarity is immaculate, and the TA's just don't have the ability to match it. There is a slight rolling effect on the sides of the TA, which does eat up some of the usable field of view. So maybe you'll have to move your binos a bit more on a tripod to cover a hillside or area that you are looking at with the TA's?? I think you still can cover it all sufficiently without missing much of anything between the two binos.
For me, if I was choosing just one (thank god I don't actually have to make this choice), I would go with the TA's because as a guide I need that instant ability to get a range on an animal. Between setting a client up for a shot and checking on the animal's range and whereabouts, I can't afford to switch up between a rangefinder and a bino a few times. I know that I will lose the animals position if I do that, so I need that all in one unit to be successful. If being able to get instant ranges when you need them isn't of concern for you, then without a doubt go with the NL's.
To sum it up and answer the OP's original question….glass quality, hands down, the NL Pure is the way to go. Functionality, hands down, the TA is your unit, and I don't think that you lose enough glass quality with the TA's, that you will find yourself handicapped out in the field. Good luck!
On a side note, I can't wait to get my hands on the 32mm TA's from Swaro…I am interested to see how much usability I feel like I lose by having the smaller objective, vs. how much I gain by having the lighter and smaller bino. Stay tuned!
Jeremy
So what can we compare? We can compare the quality of the image between the two and then decide if it's worth giving a little to get something else. When looking at the center of the image, you couldn't convince me that you can see a true difference. I'm certain there is a mathematical difference in resolution, transmission, and clarity, but not one that my eye can tell. I don't think you are losing much, if anything, by going with the TA's vs. the NL's when just comparing the centered image. As previously stated the NL's edge-to-edge clarity is immaculate, and the TA's just don't have the ability to match it. There is a slight rolling effect on the sides of the TA, which does eat up some of the usable field of view. So maybe you'll have to move your binos a bit more on a tripod to cover a hillside or area that you are looking at with the TA's?? I think you still can cover it all sufficiently without missing much of anything between the two binos.
For me, if I was choosing just one (thank god I don't actually have to make this choice), I would go with the TA's because as a guide I need that instant ability to get a range on an animal. Between setting a client up for a shot and checking on the animal's range and whereabouts, I can't afford to switch up between a rangefinder and a bino a few times. I know that I will lose the animals position if I do that, so I need that all in one unit to be successful. If being able to get instant ranges when you need them isn't of concern for you, then without a doubt go with the NL's.
To sum it up and answer the OP's original question….glass quality, hands down, the NL Pure is the way to go. Functionality, hands down, the TA is your unit, and I don't think that you lose enough glass quality with the TA's, that you will find yourself handicapped out in the field. Good luck!
On a side note, I can't wait to get my hands on the 32mm TA's from Swaro…I am interested to see how much usability I feel like I lose by having the smaller objective, vs. how much I gain by having the lighter and smaller bino. Stay tuned!
Jeremy
I know it would be a hefty investment but any merit to carrying the 10x32 TAs in the chest rig and 12x NLs in the pack for long glassing sessions?
I feel like the RF binos for final stalks on animals are the bomb. Especially for rifle hunting.
I feel like the RF binos for final stalks on animals are the bomb. Especially for rifle hunting.
mackgee
Well-Known Member
That's exactly what I do…except I have the 8x42 TA's…but I always carry both.
Jeremy
Jeremy
Not to derail the thread but I feel like the NL12x will perform very close to the 15x56slc
Nice thing about the 12xs are if you want to change it up they are still small enough to ride in a chest pack. Gives lots of versatility for different types of hunts
Nice thing about the 12xs are if you want to change it up they are still small enough to ride in a chest pack. Gives lots of versatility for different types of hunts
mackgee
Well-Known Member
I wrote a post about the NL Pures and the SLC's…You do lose a noticeable amount of power, which just based off of the published numbers, you would expect…I think that the Pures clarity make up for the lower power. Plus that field of view is larger, and the edge to edge clarity gives you a more useable view for glassing. You aren't wrong to use either one, they are both swaro's and both good for their purpose. For me I choose the Pures because that clarity, in my opinion, gives me an advantage to see that lone antler, or ear flick, or whatever you wouldn't normally see with a lesser quality image.
Jeremy
Jeremy
