• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Range Finder dilema.

Prieto9000

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
579
I just built my Long Range Rifle and I own a Bushnell 1000 arc rangefinder. I now have the problem that it only ranges out to 450yds so started to look for a new device.
I'm trying to decide if I should get the Zeiss Victory 8X27 T* PRF or the Lieica CRF 1600.
I've read some great reviews about the ballistic program on the Leica CRF 1600b, but feel I'll still need the Kestrel for wind measurement so not really considering it unless someone gives me a very good reason to spend the extra bucks.

Which device can range farther?? Which one is more accurate??
With my particular rifle and scope combo I can shoot out to 1600yds-1700yds even if I set a 200yds zero at the bottom of the elevation adjustment. Maybe I'll change the scope next year for something with a little more elevation adjustemt. Right now I have a SIII 8-32X56
 
Out of the two you mentioned go with the Leica for more distance and precision readings. If it is in your budget go Vectronix.

Jeff

Do you know what can I expect from de Zeiss?? About how far will I be able to range deer for example??
 
Do you know what can I expect from de Zeiss?? About how far will I be able to range deer for example??

With the large beam divergence of the zeiss you will need to be careful and sort out the mis-ranges on brush or whatever is close to the target. But I think it would get you to 1000 in full light ok most of the time. Again it does not have my trust.

Jeff
 
Ok. I was trying to save some cash and the guy @ the retail store recommended the Victory so I was a little excited about getting a great Rangefinder at a lower cost. I think I'll stick to the leica and see what happens.

Is there a real advantage on buying the 1600b over the 1600??
 
Interesting comment on the ARC1000. Mine ranges out to 1000 plus without any issue and compares side by side distance wse, with the Leupy my partner has.

Batteries weak per chance?

Mine was a gift from the wife, so it basically cost me nothing (monetarily).....:)
 
That will depend on your personal use. I only use my Rf's for an accurate distance reading as I use a seperate program for dial ups. So the 1600b would not do me any more than the 1600.

Jeff

That's what I think too. I really like my ballistics app. It's very user friendly and has never lead me to missing targets out to 800 yds (never tried farther).
 
Interesting comment on the ARC1000. Mine ranges out to 1000 plus without any issue and compares side by side distance wse, with the Leupy my partner has.

Batteries weak per chance?

Mine was a gift from the wife, so it basically cost me nothing (monetarily).....:)

Mine ranges out to 1000 yds also, I just need to range a glass building, but out in the shooting range the **** thing can't range steel targets farther than 400 yds.
 
See my write up on both the 1600 and 1600-B.

http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f18/leica-1600-lrf-actual-use-93312/

Both will range to 1975+, pinging off conifer trees or oak brush. Either will give you temp, baro pressure and angle; all useful/needed for your handheld ballistic calc input.

Per the internal ballistic calc, which both have, the 1600 works to 550 yds and the 1600-B works to 875 yds; not a yard further.

For me, the ability to "quickly" range a target "and" get drop data for a target that is 1) within the LRF calc range, and about to disappear over a ridge or into trees is invaluable.

When you ping a target, the temp, baro pressure and angle are ALL computed into the dope given you in the view finder.

My testing, thus far has been VERY promising; both with SHOOTER and EXBAL and actual shooting. I thought it (B model) wouldn't work past 600 yds until I used a 200 yd zero and then it was only 1/4 moa off at 875 yds.

If you feel the 1600 will fit your needs, CamerlandNY has them on sale for $650 vs the previous $800. The B model also runs $800.

Alan
 
Last edited:
I had the exact same LRF (Bushnell 'legend' 1000). I sold it after finding its shortcommings and bought a Newcon Optik 1800m (1.8km, I've done 1.5 in daylight) for $600 all in from Tactical Imports.

Overall, very impressed and if it catches your fancy, I'd go for it!


This thing is large and built like a tank. It's also made right here in Canada, not some Asian sweat shop...


LRM.jpg
 
I had the exact same LRF (Bushnell 'legend' 1000). I sold it after finding its shortcommings and bought a Newcon Optik 1800m (1.8km, I've done 1.5 in daylight) for $600 all in from Tactical Imports.

Overall, very impressed and if it catches your fancy, I'd go for it!


This thing is large and built like a tank. It's also made right here in Canada, not some Asian sweat shop...


LRM.jpg

This one looks awesome. Never heard of them before. Thanks. The only complaint I have is that it doesn't carry an inclinometer and mounting one on my scope will match the price of the CRF 1600
 
I had the exact same LRF (Bushnell 'legend' 1000). I sold it after finding its shortcommings and bought a Newcon Optik 1800m (1.8km, I've done 1.5 in daylight) for $600 all in from Tactical Imports.

Overall, very impressed and if it catches your fancy, I'd go for it!


This thing is large and built like a tank. It's also made right here in Canada, not some Asian sweat shop...


LRM.jpg

I'm seriously looking at the 1500, give me a rundown on yours!

http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEWCON-OPTI...270337489431?pt=Binocular&hash=item3ef15eba17
 
I had the exact same LRF (Bushnell 'legend' 1000). I sold it after finding its shortcommings and bought a Newcon Optik 1800m (1.8km, I've done 1.5 in daylight) for $600 all in from Tactical Imports.

Overall, very impressed and if it catches your fancy, I'd go for it!


This thing is large and built like a tank. It's also made right here in Canada, not some Asian sweat shop...


LRM.jpg

Hey Haagen,

How are the optics in that unit? How do you like the reticle?
 
Warning! This thread is more than 13 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top