Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Neck bushing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 1081647" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>OP limited the question to NECK SIZING, not BODY SIZING. And IMO there is nothing 'good' in FL sizing of necks -over partial. </p><p></p><p>The context of Dave Tooley's declaration is that NS only(no body sizing) is outdated(in his opinion). And unless turned, donuts are inherent to all cases -by manufacture method. Also unless a FL die fits like a glove, with a chamber that is not excess in clearances(not SAAMI max), FL sizing absolutely does contribute to donuts.</p><p></p><p>As far as the 'what everybody does' implication, it's easy enough to find otherwise;</p><p><a href="http://www.accurateshooter.com/guns-of-week/gunweek051/" target="_blank">Sub-Inch 600-Yard 6BR within AccurateShooter.com</a></p><p>Note that Terry Brady, using a gun built with Tooley's help, did well enough using Wilson bushings(partial neck sizing), and no body sizing.</p><p>He concedes that soon he'll have to FL size. But the only thing 'outdated' in this, and completely predictable, is that an unimproved 6BR requires body sizing eventually(not FL neck sizing, so not FL sizing). Keep in mind there is a difference between actual FL sizing and body-bushing sizing (merchandised as FL bushing dies). Many people stand behind their FL sizing as a must, when in fact -they don't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 1081647, member: 1521"] OP limited the question to NECK SIZING, not BODY SIZING. And IMO there is nothing 'good' in FL sizing of necks -over partial. The context of Dave Tooley's declaration is that NS only(no body sizing) is outdated(in his opinion). And unless turned, donuts are inherent to all cases -by manufacture method. Also unless a FL die fits like a glove, with a chamber that is not excess in clearances(not SAAMI max), FL sizing absolutely does contribute to donuts. As far as the 'what everybody does' implication, it's easy enough to find otherwise; [url=http://www.accurateshooter.com/guns-of-week/gunweek051/]Sub-Inch 600-Yard 6BR within AccurateShooter.com[/url] Note that Terry Brady, using a gun built with Tooley's help, did well enough using Wilson bushings(partial neck sizing), and no body sizing. He concedes that soon he'll have to FL size. But the only thing 'outdated' in this, and completely predictable, is that an unimproved 6BR requires body sizing eventually(not FL neck sizing, so not FL sizing). Keep in mind there is a difference between actual FL sizing and body-bushing sizing (merchandised as FL bushing dies). Many people stand behind their FL sizing as a must, when in fact -they don't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Neck bushing
Top