Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Most accurate powder scale under $200
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DartonJager" data-source="post: 2167460" data-attributes="member: 95733"><p>Obviously we are not at BRC but LRH.</p><p>But is it not a truthful and entirely appropriate statement in saying reloading techniques, equipment, components and procedures for competitive long range marksmanship brought into being by BR or PRS competitive shooters in there never ending quest for ultimate accuracy for many years now have been adopted by long range hunters in great numbers and encorporated into thier reloading procedures to enable them to make as consistent of reloaded ammunition as they can achieve to allow them to become proficient long range shooters before undertaking becoming a long range hunter?</p><p>In short am I wrong in saying we owe most of what we know of how to make the most consistently accurate ammunition to both competitive BR and PRS shooters and use the equipment and procedures inspired and created by the competitors that make up the BR and PRS communities?</p><p>I guess the real question is as a non competitive shooter where does one draw the line in how much we spend on equipment.</p><p>I know members here who have bought AMP annealing machines others bought A&D auto trickling scales and some have bought 21st century concentricity tools.</p><p>All were created with the competitive shooter community in mind but like Redding and Forster MM BR BSD's and high dollar annealing machines have found their way onto the benches of those who reload for LRH not LR competitive shooting.</p><p>So IMHO the line between the reloading techniques technology and equipment being used by BR and PRS competitive shooters and that of long range hunters get blurry all the time.</p><p>I guess what I'm asking is besides personal choice or standards how does one define a reloading tool as a need or as a luxury? Is spending $500-$1k on a single piece of reloading equipment justifiable if it helps us achieve our accuracy goals or enables us to overcome a obstacle we have identified beyond doubt that is the cause preventing us from achieving the consistency currently lacking in our reloads and is stopping us from achieving our accuracy goals?</p><p>Just my opinion</p><p>Felt I should add do we not have the PRS competitive community to thank (not entirely but to a large degree) for the great numbers of never before seen superb scopes that have allowed us to take long range hunting out to distanced never before dreamed of?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DartonJager, post: 2167460, member: 95733"] Obviously we are not at BRC but LRH. But is it not a truthful and entirely appropriate statement in saying reloading techniques, equipment, components and procedures for competitive long range marksmanship brought into being by BR or PRS competitive shooters in there never ending quest for ultimate accuracy for many years now have been adopted by long range hunters in great numbers and encorporated into thier reloading procedures to enable them to make as consistent of reloaded ammunition as they can achieve to allow them to become proficient long range shooters before undertaking becoming a long range hunter? In short am I wrong in saying we owe most of what we know of how to make the most consistently accurate ammunition to both competitive BR and PRS shooters and use the equipment and procedures inspired and created by the competitors that make up the BR and PRS communities? I guess the real question is as a non competitive shooter where does one draw the line in how much we spend on equipment. I know members here who have bought AMP annealing machines others bought A&D auto trickling scales and some have bought 21st century concentricity tools. All were created with the competitive shooter community in mind but like Redding and Forster MM BR BSD's and high dollar annealing machines have found their way onto the benches of those who reload for LRH not LR competitive shooting. So IMHO the line between the reloading techniques technology and equipment being used by BR and PRS competitive shooters and that of long range hunters get blurry all the time. I guess what I'm asking is besides personal choice or standards how does one define a reloading tool as a need or as a luxury? Is spending $500-$1k on a single piece of reloading equipment justifiable if it helps us achieve our accuracy goals or enables us to overcome a obstacle we have identified beyond doubt that is the cause preventing us from achieving the consistency currently lacking in our reloads and is stopping us from achieving our accuracy goals? Just my opinion Felt I should add do we not have the PRS competitive community to thank (not entirely but to a large degree) for the great numbers of never before seen superb scopes that have allowed us to take long range hunting out to distanced never before dreamed of? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Most accurate powder scale under $200
Top