Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
Mercury Vs Mechanical Recoil reducers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alcesgigas" data-source="post: 1091458" data-attributes="member: 34925"><p>I had a mercury (11 ounce) in a 375 H&H, no brake on the 10.5# (loaded and scoped) rifle. Seemed to slow the recoil down and thus--at least to me--was more pleasant to shoot than any of my 270s'. Now it's externally fastened to my Edge (21#) that has a Magnum 4-Port Muscle brake, but shooting 300 gr. Bergers up to 3015 fps. Slower recoil yet and astonishingly pleasant to shoot.</p><p></p><p>Mechanics will wear out; mercury can't. I haven't a clue what, other than weight, would domesticate a shotgun...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alcesgigas, post: 1091458, member: 34925"] I had a mercury (11 ounce) in a 375 H&H, no brake on the 10.5# (loaded and scoped) rifle. Seemed to slow the recoil down and thus--at least to me--was more pleasant to shoot than any of my 270s'. Now it's externally fastened to my Edge (21#) that has a Magnum 4-Port Muscle brake, but shooting 300 gr. Bergers up to 3015 fps. Slower recoil yet and astonishingly pleasant to shoot. Mechanics will wear out; mercury can't. I haven't a clue what, other than weight, would domesticate a shotgun... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
Mercury Vs Mechanical Recoil reducers?
Top