Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March 2.5x25x52mm SFP scopes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rich Coyle" data-source="post: 1450016" data-attributes="member: 70559"><p>Why would you keep something that is now working?<strong><span style="font-size: 18px">!</span></strong> That sounds like the first one I got. I sent in it for service. When it came back it was as clear as the ones I have now, but only above 10X. I sent it back for a refund. You need to send them in for service. The next three were what I expected. Not that I expected them to be better than the more expensive scopes, but am delighted they are. So far everyone who as compared theirs at my optics chart and deer antlers, except the Swarovski z8i and higher costing Nightforces, have agreed the Bushnells are equal or better.</p><p></p><p>I'm not necessarily a Bushnell fan boy. In fact I still think Tasco World Class is the best scope value on the market. They just can't keep up in low light. I keep buying and returning scopes in hopes of beating my 4 1/2-30X50s. My most recent purchase was the new Track scope. I purchased four of the Bushnell 6500 2 1/2-16X both 44mm and 50mm for my .375-.416 Rem Mag and all are gone. None of them have glass as good as the three 4 1/2-30X50s I have.</p><p></p><p>Again I will repeat the first sentence: W<span style="font-size: 14px"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="color: rgb(20, 20, 20)">hy would you keep something that is now working?</span></span></span><strong><strong><span style="font-size: 14px"><span style="color: rgb(20, 20, 20)"><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="font-size: 18px">!</span></span></span></span></strong></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rich Coyle, post: 1450016, member: 70559"] Why would you keep something that is now working?[B][SIZE=5]![/SIZE][/B] That sounds like the first one I got. I sent in it for service. When it came back it was as clear as the ones I have now, but only above 10X. I sent it back for a refund. You need to send them in for service. The next three were what I expected. Not that I expected them to be better than the more expensive scopes, but am delighted they are. So far everyone who as compared theirs at my optics chart and deer antlers, except the Swarovski z8i and higher costing Nightforces, have agreed the Bushnells are equal or better. I'm not necessarily a Bushnell fan boy. In fact I still think Tasco World Class is the best scope value on the market. They just can't keep up in low light. I keep buying and returning scopes in hopes of beating my 4 1/2-30X50s. My most recent purchase was the new Track scope. I purchased four of the Bushnell 6500 2 1/2-16X both 44mm and 50mm for my .375-.416 Rem Mag and all are gone. None of them have glass as good as the three 4 1/2-30X50s I have. Again I will repeat the first sentence: W[SIZE=14px][FONT=Verdana][COLOR=rgb(20, 20, 20)]hy would you keep something that is now working?[/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE][B][B][SIZE=14px][COLOR=rgb(20, 20, 20)][SIZE=5][SIZE=5]![/SIZE][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE][/B][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March 2.5x25x52mm SFP scopes?
Top