Interesting post. I guess part of the reason mention 100 yd results so much is that is a commonly available shooting distance that seems to be a standard even for the magazines and manufacturers. It really does't mean much though for what the rifle will do at greater distances. Someone mentioned the shooting system in an earlier post which includes the shooter...
Some observations that i see but are not really original.
I stopped shooting off a rest and use a bipod even when working up loads. I figure I never have a rest when hunting and definately need all the practice I can get.
My lighter carbon barreled rifle recoils more and if I do not mange the recoil pulse the same way each time, impact changes. My heavy barreled Remington shoots better now because it is easieer to get the same recoil management from me now that I realize how critical it is to hold the rifle the exact same way, get the exact same cheek weld/eye relief etc.
Some of my rifles shoot the same way cold and clean and some have poi shift unless fouled? The first shot is the one that counts when hunting.
Some loads shoot better at longer ranges even though they did not shoot as well as others at short range.
Since I got the carbon barreled 308 that was custom- built and realize that it is potentially capable of amaIng accuracy, I see more how the things I do wrong influences the results. I look at accuracy as starting with me and approach shooting a rifle like it was a bow now.
The bottom line is comparing rifle accuracy on the net is vague without knowing the quality of the ammo and shooter etc. I guess 100 yard 1 moa is a standard that doesn't mean too much unless you know the skill off the shooter, quality of ammo, kind of rest, optics, conditions and all the ingedients of the "shooting system."