Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
IMR VS Hogden 4831
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 321133" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>Until recently they were different companys. </p><p>Truly, I never understood the similarity in numbering, and wish Hodgdon had stayed away from IMR.</p><p></p><p>I use both, but IMR is better for some cartridges, it's more consistant lot-to-lot, and as temp stable(if not more so) than Hodgdon, despite the hype.</p><p>I don't like them fiddling with good ole reliable IMR.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, do not assume they are the same because of the number designations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 321133, member: 1521"] Until recently they were different companys. Truly, I never understood the similarity in numbering, and wish Hodgdon had stayed away from IMR. I use both, but IMR is better for some cartridges, it's more consistant lot-to-lot, and as temp stable(if not more so) than Hodgdon, despite the hype. I don't like them fiddling with good ole reliable IMR. Anyway, do not assume they are the same because of the number designations. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
IMR VS Hogden 4831
Top