Hornady a-max vs. SMK's

W

*WyoWhisper*

Guest
Hornady a-max vs. SMK\'s

I finallly got a little break from the busy season we are having to get in some trigger time...

I have been converted to the SMK way of things and swear by them ...however... I noticed that I get amazingly accurate and at times more accurate results from the a-maxs...

anyone else get these similar results? Anyone have any hunting expierience with them...

curious to know.....
 

Len Backus

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 2, 2001
Messages
6,714
Re: Hornady a-max vs. SMK\'s

I used a 7mm A-max for three of four deer shot last year at ranges of 525,666, 670 and 690 yards. Terminal velocity was about 2,000 or more if I remember correctly. All were one-shot kills but there were no exit wounds. This fact contributed to my inability to recover the 670 deer through tracking...no blood trail after 80 yards. Found it weeks later only 100 yards away in tall marsh grass. This prompted me to try the MK, hoping for pass-through. I cut open one MK and one A-max to find the jacket on the MK is 1.5 times the thickness of the A-max jacket.

I switched over to the MK in time for my Coues deer hunt in Mexico last January. Accuracy was similar to the A-max. At 666 yards it was a lung shot, deer ran 20 yards. no exit wound again. Didn't get a chance for an autopsy to check inside stuff.

So...since I was thinking about needing a bigger gun for long range elk anyway I recently got one in 30-378. This will shoot a heavier MK (240 vs 162/168) bullet at similar velocity. I think I'll try it for deer out past 600 where I would like to have the added margin for error offered by the 1.5 times higher impact energy...hoping for an exit wound or at least more penetration on good but not-quite-perfect shots.

In any case, the A-max has a superior BC in any caliber at similar bullet weight. This is a huge factor in real-world hunting accuracy where bullet drift is probably the single biggest factor. However, in .308 caliber the huge 240 grain MK has a .711 BC vs the .625 for the 7mm, 162 grain. So this cartridge/bullet combo will be superior in that regard also.

[ 07-14-2002: Message edited by: Len Backus ]
 

CatShooter

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 8, 2001
Messages
1,224
Location
South Windham, CT - in Moo-Cow country
Re: Hornady a-max vs. SMK\'s

Len Backus...

>"I used a 7mm A-max... [snip]... All were one-shot kills but there were no exit wounds."<

Could you approximate the bullet penetration in these hits?... were they long torso shots, or side/lung shots?

CatShooter.

(Don't need no steenkin' magnums for fluffy
 

Len Backus

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 2, 2001
Messages
6,714
Re: Hornady a-max vs. SMK\'s

All were broadside lung shots.The bullets ended up against the hide on the opposite side.
 

Trending threads

Recent Posts

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top